The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was (1) to determine whether changes in intra- and interrater reliability occur for inexperienced listeners' judgments of overall severity, roughness, and breathiness in dysphonic and normal speakers after 2 hours of listener training; and (2) to determine the acoustic bases of inexperienced listeners' judgments before and after training. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, single group, pre- and postdesign. METHODS Thirty adult dysphonic and six normal speaker samples were selected from a database. Samples included 21 test stimuli and 15 training stimuli of both sustained vowels and connected speech. Sixteen inexperienced listeners judged all samples for overall severity, roughness, and breathiness using visual analog scales. Each listener provided pretraining ratings at baseline. Listeners were then trained using 15 anchor voice samples and 15 training stimuli. During training, listeners were provided with definitions of rating dimensions, accuracy feedback, and anchor samples. Listeners then judged test stimuli in a posttraining session. Speaker samples also were analyzed acoustically. RESULTS Intrarater reliability was least variable for judgments of overall severity, but improved further with training. Listener judgments of roughness and breathiness in vowels were least reliable at baseline, but they significantly improved between listeners after training. Finally, measures of cepstral peak prominence significantly predicted all voice quality judgments except roughness in vowels, which was predicted by shimmer. The acoustic bases of group perceptual judgments did not seem to change with training. CONCLUSIONS These findings have implications for developing training programs in perceptual evaluation and mapping relationships between acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voice disorders.

[1]  J Kreiman,et al.  The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. Childers,et al.  Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Norman J. Lass,et al.  Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice , 1979 .

[4]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Listener experience and perception of voice quality. , 1990 .

[5]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  G. Fairbanks Voice and articulation drillbook , 1960 .

[7]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Individual differences in voice quality perception. , 1992 .

[8]  N. Roy,et al.  Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[9]  S. B. Davis Acoustic Characteristics of Normal and Pathological Voices , 1979 .

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  L E Humes,et al.  Identification of multidimensional stimuli containing speech cues and the effects of training. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  P. van de Heyning,et al.  Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[13]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  F L Wuyts,et al.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[15]  I. Deary,et al.  The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. , 2004, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[16]  J Kreiman,et al.  Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Cepstral Peak Prominence: A More Reliable Measure of Dysphonia , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[18]  C L Ludlow,et al.  The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  Antoine Giovanni,et al.  Correlation of Instrumental Voice Evaluation with Perceptual Voice Analysis Using a Modified Visual Analog Scale , 2002, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[20]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Ingham,et al.  Time-interval measurement of stuttering: effects of training with highly agreed or poorly agreed exemplars. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  J Kreiman,et al.  Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Philip C Doyle,et al.  Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Jody Kreiman,et al.  Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis , 2000 .

[25]  Karen M. K. Chan,et al.  A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[26]  G. Krom Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  Philip C Doyle,et al.  Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[28]  C R Rabinov,et al.  Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  M. Hirano,et al.  Clinical Examination of Voice , 1981 .

[30]  Effects of Perceptual Training Based upon Synthesized Voice Signals , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  S. Niimi,et al.  A Comparison of Voice Quality Ratings Made by Japanese and American Listeners Using the GRBAS Scale , 2003, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[32]  Eml Yiu,et al.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Perceptual Evaluation Training Program , 2004 .

[33]  I. J. Deary,et al.  The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[34]  J. Kreiman,et al.  The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[36]  Y. Heman-Ackah,et al.  The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[37]  Kathryn Hird,et al.  Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Y. Koike,et al.  Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathologic voices. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[40]  Raymond D. Kent Hearing and Believing , 1996 .

[41]  Edwin M-L Yiu,et al.  The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[42]  Y. Qi,et al.  The estimation of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous speech for disordered voices. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.