CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique.

PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to use an extended CT scale technique (ECTS) to reduce artifacts due to metal implants and to optimize CT imaging parameters for metal implants using an experimental model. METHOD Osteotomies were performed in 20 porcine femur specimens. One hundred cobalt-base screws and 24 steel plates were used for osteosynthesis in these specimens. Artificial lesions were produced in 50 screws, such as osteolysis near the screws (mimicking lysis due to infection, tumor, or loosening), displacement of the screws, as well as fractures of the screws. All specimens were examined using eight different CT protocols: four conventional (CCT) and four spiral (SCT) CT protocols with different milliampere-second values (130 and 480 mAs for CCT, 130 and 300 mAs for SCT), kilovolt potentials (120 and 140 kVp), and slice thicknesses (2 and 5 mm). The images were analyzed by three observers using a standard window (maximum window width 4,000 HU) and ECTS (maximum window width 40,000 HU). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and image quality was assessed according to a five level scale. RESULTS Metal artifacts were significantly reduced using ECTS (p < 0.05). The highest diagnostic performance was obtained using ECTS with the thinnest slice thickness. Metal artifacts were more pronounced using SCT. In this experimental model, exposure dose and kilovolt potential had no significant impact on diagnostic performance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION ECTS improved imaging of metal implants. In this study, no significant effects of exposure dose and kilovolt potential were noted. Metal artifacts were more prominent using SCT than using CCT.

[1]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[3]  E. Fishman,et al.  Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  E. Fishman,et al.  Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. , 1986, Radiology.

[5]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[6]  P. Rokkanen,et al.  Intramedullary fixation of distal femoral diaphyseal osteotomies with absorbable self-reinforced poly-L-lactide and metallic intramedullary rods assessed by plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental study in rabbits. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  K Freeman,et al.  CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[8]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[9]  W. Kim,et al.  Choledochal cyst with or without biliary atresia in neonates and young infants: US differentiation. , 1998, Radiology.

[10]  M. Yaremchuk,et al.  An electronic device for surgical glove testing. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  CT BONE DENSITOMETRY OF THE ANCHORAGE OF ARTIFICIAL KNEE JOINTS , 1985 .

[12]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. , 1981 .

[13]  D. Robertson,et al.  Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  R Poss,et al.  Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  D. Meier,et al.  MR Imaging of Large Nonferromagnetic Metallic Implants at 1.5 T , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  C. Petersilge,et al.  Accuracy of Using Computed Tomography to Identify Pedicle Screw Placement in Cadaveric Human Lumbar Spine , 1997, Spine.

[17]  R A Novelline,et al.  Comparison of CT Imaging Artifacts from Craniomaxillofacial Internal Fixation Devices , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.