The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical Framework, Psychometric Properties, and Applied Yields

The Motivation and Engagement Wheel is a multidimensional conceptual framework that represents salient cognitive and behavioural dimensions relevant to motivation and engagement. The Wheel and its accompanying assessment tool—the Motivation and Engagement Scale (MES)—comprise eleven first‐order factors (under four higher‐order factors): self‐efficacy, valuing, and mastery orientation (adaptive cognition); planning, task management, and persistence (adaptive behaviour); anxiety, failure avoidance, and uncertain control (impeding/maladaptive cognition); and self‐handicapping and disengagement (maladaptive behaviour). We describe theoretical foundations of the MES, summarise corresponding forms of the MES for use in academic, work, sport, and music settings, and report on their psychometric properties in local and cross‐cultural settings. We then review MES research addressing substantive and applied issues, focusing on educational research (i.e., looking at use of the MES to explore the effects of gender, grade retention, delayed school entry, taking a gap year, and the role of the home on motivation and engagement). Through psychometric and substantive applications, it is proposed that this integrative approach to multidimensional motivation and engagement instrumentation has utility across diverse performance and cultural settings, educational levels, and academic subjects. As such, it can be considered a meaningful recent contribution to psycho‐educational measurement, research, theory, and practice.

[1]  Andrew J. Martin.  Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Peer relationships and adolescents' academic and non-academic outcomes: same-sex and opposite-sex peer effects and the mediating role of school engagement. , 2011, The British journal of educational psychology.

[3]  J. McLeod,et al.  Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of Males and Females in School and Their Initial Destinations After Leaving School , 2000 .

[4]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[5]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[6]  Andrew J. Martin.  Exploring the effects of a youth enrichment program on academic motivation and engagement , 2005 .

[7]  H. Marsh,et al.  Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. , 2007 .

[8]  Motivation and engagement in diverse performance settings: Testing their generality across school, university/college, work, sport, music, and daily life , 2008 .

[9]  B. Weiner,et al.  Integrating Social and Personal Theories of Achievement Striving , 1994 .

[10]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Clergy Motivation and Occupational Well-being: Exploring a Quadripolar Model and Its Role in Predicting Burnout and Engagement , 2011, Journal of Religion and Health.

[11]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[12]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[13]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? , 2008 .

[14]  A. Poropat.  A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Bret P. Smith.  Goal orientation, implicit theory of ability, and collegiate instrumental music practice , 2005 .

[16]  J. Greeno.  THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[17]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure , 1985 .

[18]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Andrew J. Martin.  Holding back and holding behind: Grade retention and students’ non-academic and academic outcomes , 2011 .

[20]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[21]  Stephanie T. Lanza,et al.  Changes in children's self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. , 2002, Child development.

[22]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes , 2010 .

[23]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Motivation and Engagement in English, Mathematics and Science High School Subjects: Towards an Understanding of Multidimensional Domain Specificity. , 2007 .

[24]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[25]  Andrew J. Martin.  Should Students Have a Gap Year? Motivation and Performance Factors Relevant to Time Out after Completing School. , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew J. Martin.  Motivation and Engagement Across the Academic Life Span , 2009 .

[27]  Shane R. Jimerson,et al.  Meta-analysis of Grade Retention Research: Implications for Practice in the 21st Century , 2001 .

[28]  M. Maehr,et al.  The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory , 2007 .

[29]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Achievement Motivation among Chinese and Australian School Students: Assessing Differences of Kind and Differences of Degree , 2010 .

[30]  J. Connell,et al.  A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. , 1985, Child development.

[31]  Andrew J. Martin.  How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive–methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians , 2008 .

[32]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[33]  A. Elliot.  The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation , 2006 .

[34]  J. Berry,et al.  Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. , 1998 .

[35]  I. A. Jóhannesson.  To teach boys and girls: a pro‐feminist perspective on the boys' debate in Iceland , 2004 .

[36]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Home, Parents, and Achievement Motivation: A Study of Key Home and Parental Factors that Predict Student Motivation and Engagement , 2009 .

[37]  Andrew J. Martin.  Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention ☆ , 2008 .

[38]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Motivation and engagement in music and sport: testing a multidimensional framework in diverse performance settings. , 2007, Journal of personality.

[39]  Andrew J. Martin.  Motivation and Engagement in the Workplace: Examining a Multidimensional Framework and Instrument From a Measurement and Evaluation Perspective , 2009 .

[40]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[41]  Andrew J. Martin.  Age Appropriateness and Motivation, Engagement, and Performance in High School: Effects of Age within Cohort, Grade Retention, and Delayed School Entry. , 2009 .

[42]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Personal bests (PBs): a proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[43]  K. Yuan.  Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics , 2005, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Coping and buoyancy in the workplace: Understanding their effects on teachers' work-related well-being and engagement , 2009 .

[45]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Grade Retention, Postsecondary Education, and Public Aid Receipt , 2010 .

[46]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Multilevel Motivation and Engagement: Assessing Construct Validity Across Students and Schools , 2010 .

[47]  K. Rowe,et al.  Investigating the relationship between students’ attentive–inattentive behaviors in the classroom and their literacy progress: Chapter 1 Introduction: Effects and context , 1999 .

[48]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[49]  P. Alexander,et al.  A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[50]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  To Free the Spirit? Motivation and Engagement of Indigenous Students , 2008 .