BasicBayes: A tutor system for simple Bayesian inference

To date, attempts to teach Bayesian inference to nonexperts have not met with much success. BasicBayes, the computerized tutor presented here, is an attempt to change this state of affairs. BasicBayes is based on a novel theoretical framework about Bayesian reasoning recently introduced by Gigerenzer and Hoffrage (1995). This framework focuses on the connection between “cognitive algorithms” and “information formats.” BasicBayes teaches people how to translate Bayesian text problems into frequency formats, which have been shown to entail computationally simpler cognitive algorithms than those entailed by probability formats. The components and mode of functioning of BasicBayes are described in detail. Empirical evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of BasicBayes in teaching people simple Bayesian inference. Because of its flexible system architecture, BasicBayes can also be used as a research tool.

[1]  M. Bar-Hillel.  The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[2]  W. Casscells,et al.  Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[4]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. , 1988 .

[5]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Modeling and Intelligent Tutoring , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  Arthur J. Lurigio,et al.  Improving Probation Decisions through Statistical Training , 1990 .

[9]  L. Beach,et al.  Experience and the base-rate fallacy. , 1982, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[10]  K. Fiedler.  The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors , 1988 .

[11]  Johan Hoogstraten,et al.  Effect of Feedback on Base-Rate Utilization , 1988 .

[12]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[13]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[14]  B. F. Skinner,et al.  The Shame of American Education. , 1984 .

[15]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Programming in Common LISP , 1985 .

[16]  W. Edwards,et al.  Sampling distributions and probability revisions. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  R. Nisbett.  Rules for reasoning , 1993 .

[18]  J. Shaughnessy.  Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. , 1992 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[20]  D. Eddy.  Judgment under uncertainty: Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities , 1982 .

[21]  G. Gigerenzer.  Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa). , 1994 .

[22]  R. E. Schaefer,et al.  The evaluation of individual and aggregated subjective probability distributions , 1976 .