Neural correlates of impulsive-violent behavior: an event-related potential study

Impulsive-violent offenders are often less capable of controlling their behavior. A cued Go/No-go task was used to test the hypothesis that impulsive-violent behavior reflects a deficit in the ability to inhibit prepotent responses and could be reflected in the measurement of event-related potentials. Results showed that the amplitudes of the N2 component at Fz reflected different degrees of inhibition in impulsive-violent offenders compared with matched controls. The N2 amplitude (No-go minus Go) was significantly lower in the impulsive-violent offenders than in matched controls. The amplitude of N2 increased when effort was required to withhold the Go intention. A smaller N2 amplitude was seen in offenders, suggesting difficulties with inhibition of prepotent behavior.

[1]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Suppression of visually initiated hand movement by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey , 1989, Brain Research.

[2]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  L. Balázs,et al.  Effects of cue information on response production and inhibition measured by event-related potentials. , 1999, Acta physiologica Hungarica.

[4]  B. Kopp,et al.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Benkelfat,et al.  Tryptophan Depletion, Executive Functions, and Disinhibition in Aggressive, Adolescent Males , 1998, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[6]  R. Blair,et al.  A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath , 1995, Cognition.

[7]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Electrical activity in the prefrontal cortex specific to no-go reaction of conditioned hand movement with colour discrimination in the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. , 1994 .

[11]  David A. Taylor.  Time Course of Context Effects. , 1977 .

[12]  J Duffy,et al.  The orbitomedial frontal syndrome. , 1993, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[13]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  A. Kok.  Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[15]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[16]  J. Gray,et al.  Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. , 1990 .

[17]  J. Gray,et al.  A Critique of Eysenck’s Theory of Personality , 1981 .

[18]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.