Protein Modularity, Cooperative Binding, and Hybrid Regulatory States Underlie Transcriptional Network Diversification

We examine how different transcriptional network structures can evolve from an ancestral network. By characterizing how the ancestral mode of gene regulation for genes specific to a-type cells in yeast species evolved from an activating paradigm to a repressing one, we show that regulatory protein modularity, conversion of one cis-regulatory sequence to another, distribution of binding energy among protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, and exploitation of ancestral network features all contribute to the evolution of a novel regulatory mode. The formation of this derived mode of regulation did not disrupt the ancestral mode and thereby created a hybrid regulatory state where both means of transcription regulation (ancestral and derived) contribute to the conserved expression pattern of the network. Finally, we show how this hybrid regulatory state has resolved in different ways in different lineages to generate the diversity of regulatory network structures observed in modern species.

[1]  J. Piškur,et al.  PYD2 encodes 5,6-dihydropyrimidine amidohydrolase, which participates in a novel fungal catabolic pathway. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  R. S. Muir,et al.  Gene disruption with PCR products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Gene.

[3]  Joseph W. Thornton,et al.  Resurrecting ancient genes: experimental analysis of extinct molecules , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  H. Zhong,et al.  The yeast alpha2 and Mcm1 proteins interact through a region similar to a motif found in homeodomain proteins of higher eukaryotes , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the yeast MATalpha2/MCM1/DNA ternary complex. , 1998, Nature.

[6]  B. Tuch,et al.  Computational and experimental approaches double the number of known introns in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. , 2007, Genome research.

[7]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  G. Wray The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels : On Genes and Form , 2005 .

[10]  Vincent J. Lynch,et al.  Transposon-mediated rewiring of gene regulatory networks contributed to the evolution of pregnancy in mammals , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[11]  M. Berbee,et al.  Dating divergences in the Fungal Tree of Life: review and new analyses. , 2006, Mycologia.

[12]  Ari Löytynoja,et al.  An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Keleher,et al.  The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein , 1988, Cell.

[14]  A. Johnson,et al.  Operator‐constitutive mutations in a DNA sequence recognized by a yeast homeodomain. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Satoru Miyano,et al.  Open source clustering software , 2004 .

[16]  A. E. Tsong,et al.  Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic , 2006, Nature.

[17]  André Nantel,et al.  Evolutionary Tinkering with Conserved Components of a Transcriptional Regulatory Network , 2010, PLoS biology.

[18]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[19]  Alok J. Saldanha,et al.  Java Treeview - extensible visualization of microarray data , 2004, Bioinform..

[20]  A. Vershon,et al.  Crystal structure of the MATa1/MATalpha2 homeodomain heterodimer in complex with DNA containing an A-tract. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Degradation Signal Masking by Heterodimerization of MATα2 and MATa1 Blocks Their Mutual Destruction by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway , 1998, Cell.

[22]  J. Derisi,et al.  Genomic dissection of the cell-type-specification circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Tuite,et al.  The CUG codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in Candida albicans. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  A. E. Tsong,et al.  Evolution of a Combinatorial Transcriptional Circuit A Case Study in Yeasts , 2003, Cell.

[25]  Gregory C. Finnigan,et al.  Evolution of increased complexity in a molecular machine , 2012, Nature.

[26]  Hao Li,et al.  The Evolution of Combinatorial Gene Regulation in Fungi , 2008, PLoS biology.

[27]  Hao Li,et al.  Evolution of Eukaryotic Transcription Circuits , 2008, Science.

[28]  K. Komachi,et al.  The WD repeats of Tup1 interact with the homeo domain protein alpha 2. , 1994, Genes & development.

[29]  O. Homann,et al.  MochiView: versatile software for genome browsing and DNA motif analysis , 2010, BMC Biology.

[30]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  chipD: a web tool to design oligonucleotide probes for high-density tiling arrays , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  A. Wach PCR‐synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae , 1996, Yeast.

[32]  Song Tan,et al.  Crystal structure of the yeast MATα2/MCM1/DNA ternary complex , 1998, Nature.

[33]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Control of cell type in yeast by the mating type locus. The alpha 1-alpha 2 hypothesis. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Jeremy Schmutz,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Pelvic Reduction in Sticklebacks by Recurrent Deletion of a Pitx1 Enhancer , 2010, Science.

[35]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Control of cell type in yeast by the mating type locus: The α1-α2 hypothesis☆ , 1981 .

[36]  L. Guarente,et al.  Fusion of Escherichia coli lacZ to the cytochrome c gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Michael Knop,et al.  A versatile toolbox for PCR‐based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes , 2004, Yeast.

[38]  S. Carroll,et al.  Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila , 2005, Nature.

[39]  Holly M. Mortensen,et al.  Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[40]  G. Butler,et al.  Evolution of the MAT locus and its Ho endonuclease in yeast species. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Mikael Bodén,et al.  MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Yves Van de Peer,et al.  Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[44]  A. Vershon,et al.  A short, disordered protein region mediates interactions between the homeodomain of the yeast α2 protein and the MCM1 protein , 1993, Cell.

[45]  Christina M. Hull,et al.  Identification of a mating type-like locus in the asexual pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. , 1999, Science.

[46]  D. Thompson,et al.  From elements to modules: regulatory evolution in Ascomycota fungi. , 2009, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[47]  J. Doebley,et al.  Transcriptional Regulators and the Evolution of Plant Form , 1998, Plant Cell.

[48]  M. Lynch The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  Bryan D. Kolaczkowski,et al.  Robustness of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction to Phylogenetic Uncertainty , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  A. Johnson,et al.  The carboxy-terminal tail of the homeo domain protein alpha 2 is required for function with a second homeo domain protein. , 1993, Genes & development.

[51]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Vincent J. Lynch,et al.  Resurrecting the Role of Transcription Factor Change in Developmental Evolution , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  A. Regev,et al.  Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M. Hall,et al.  Homeo domain of the yeast repressor alpha 2 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain but is not sufficient for repression. , 1987, Science.

[55]  Seán S. ÓhÉigeartaigh,et al.  Evolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating-type switching accidents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  A repressor (MATα2 product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast , 1985, Cell.

[57]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast , 1989, Nature.

[58]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Biofilm Matrix Regulation by Candida albicans Zap1 , 2009, PLoS biology.

[59]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[60]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Intercalation of a new tier of transcription regulation into an ancient circuit , 2010, Nature.

[61]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans , 2006, Science.

[62]  Hiten D. Madhani,et al.  From a to α : yeast as a model for cellular differentiation , 2007 .