Optimization of Multiple Responses of Ultrasonic Machining (USM) Process: A Comparative Study

Article history: Received August202012 Received in revised format December 12 2012 Accepted December14 2012 Available online 14December 2012 Ultrasonic machining (USM) process has multiple performance measures, e.g. material removal rate (MRR), tool wear rate (TWR), surface roughness (SR) etc., which are affected by several process parameters. The researchers commonly attempted to optimize USM process with respect to individual responses, separately. In the recent past, several systematic procedures for dealing with the multi-response optimization problems have been proposed in the literature. Although most of these methods use complex mathematics or statistics, there are some simple methods, which can be comprehended and implemented by the engineers to optimize the multiple responses of USM processes. However, the relative optimization performance of these approaches is unknown because the effectiveness of different methods has been demonstrated using different sets of process data. In this paper, the computational requirements for four simple methods are presented, and two sets of past experimental data on USM processes are analysed using these methods. The relative performances of these methods are then compared. The results show that weighted signal-to-noise (WSN) ratio method and utility theory (UT) method usually give better overall optimisation performance for the USM process than the other approaches. © 2013 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved

[1]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys : A review , 2006 .

[2]  R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Multi response optimization of wire EDM operations using robust design of experiments , 2006 .

[3]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  An investigation into the machining characteristics of titanium using ultrasonic machining , 2008 .

[4]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[5]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Taguchi technique for modeling material removal rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium , 2007 .

[6]  P.Narender Singh,et al.  Optimization by Grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining Al–10%SiCP composites , 2004 .

[7]  Kwok-Leung Tsui Robust design optimization for multiple characteristic problems , 1999 .

[8]  P. Shahabudeen,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of multi-response problems in the Taguchi method using genetic algorithm , 2006 .

[9]  Hm Hsu,et al.  A genetic algorithm for the optimal design of microwave filters , 1999 .

[10]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  Modeling the material removal rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium using dimensional analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Joseph J. Pignatiello,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR ROBUST MULTIRESPONSE QUALITY ENGINEERING , 1993 .

[12]  Lee-Ing Tong,et al.  A NOVEL MEANS OF APPLYING NEURAL NETWORKS TO OPTIMIZE THE MULTIRESPONSE PROBLEM , 2001 .

[13]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Quality optimization (multi-characteristics) through Taguchi's technique and utility concept , 2000 .

[14]  Rupinder Singh,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tool wear rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium , 2009 .

[15]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  Investigating and modeling tool-wear rate in the ultrasonic machining of titanium , 2009 .

[16]  R. S. Walia,et al.  Multi-Response Optimization of CFAAFM Process Through Taguchi Method and Utility Concept , 2006 .

[17]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Mathematical modelling of surface roughness in ultrasonic machining of titanium using Buckingham-Π approach: a review , 2009 .

[18]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions , 2000 .

[19]  Akshay Dvivedi,et al.  Surface quality evaluation in ultrasonic drilling through the Taguchi technique , 2007 .

[20]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[21]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  An experimental study on ultrasonic machining of pure titanium using designed experiments , 2008 .

[22]  A. Khuri,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions , 1981 .

[23]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process , 2011 .

[24]  P. J. Pawar,et al.  Parameter Optimization of Ultrasonic Machining Process Using Nontraditional Optimization Algorithms , 2010 .

[25]  Muh-Cherng Wu,et al.  An enhanced Taguchi method for optimizing SMT processes , 1992 .

[26]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Taguchi’s optimization of process parameters for production accuracy in ultrasonic drilling of engineering ceramics , 2009, Prod. Eng..

[27]  Lee-Ing Tong,et al.  Optimization of multiple quality responses involving qualitative and quantitative characteristics in IC manufacturing using neural networks , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[28]  D. Aspinwall,et al.  Review on ultrasonic machining , 1998 .