Network meta-analysis as a tool in clinical practice guidelines

[1]  P. Siersema,et al.  EAES rapid guideline: updated systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on the management of common bile duct stones , 2022, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  D. Mavridis,et al.  Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence , 2021, Prevention Science.

[3]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[5]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[6]  J. Higgins,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  David Rind,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[9]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Walter F. Stenning,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2003 .