论文信息 - BIAS IN JOURNAL RATINGS

BIAS IN JOURNAL RATINGS

The present study investigated the association between faculty publication records and their point-based evaluations of finance journals. No relationship was detected between the merit points assigned to finance journals and the journal-specific success of the faculty rendering the journal ratings. However, a negative relationship was found between general publication success of faculty and the merit points they assigned to lower-level journal publications. The association was particularly strong for faculty who had published in the top three finance journals.

Mike Cudd | M. Cudd | Joseph L. Morris

[1] Alan L. Porter,et al. Use lists with caution. , 1976 .

[2] Joel R. Levin,et al. The name of the journal fame game: Quality or familiarity? , 1976 .

[3] A. Porter. A comparison of the various ratings of psychology journals. , 1978 .

[4] Harold D. Warner,et al. Ratings of psychology journals. , 1973 .

[5] R. Coe,et al. EVALUATING THE FINANCE JOURNALS: THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRPERSON'S PERSPECTIVE , 1983 .

[6] G. Adams,et al. Qualitative ratings of human development journals. , 1981, Human development.

[7] K. Hastie. A Perspective on Management Education , 1982 .

[8] Ray Over. Journal ranking by citation analysis: Some inconsistencies. , 1978 .

[9] P. Davis,et al. Faculty Ratings of Major Economics Departments by Citations , 1984 .

[10] H. Keselman,et al. Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association. , 1975 .

[11] George H. Hempel. Teaching and Research in Finance: Perceptions, Conflicts, and the Future , 1983 .