Randomized marine acquisition with compressive sampling matrices

Seismic data acquisition in marine environments is a costly process that calls for the adoption of simultaneous-source or randomized acquisition - an emerging technology that is stimulating both geophysical research and commercial efforts. Simultaneous marine acquisition calls for the development of a new set of design principles and post-processing tools. In this paper, we discuss the properties of a specific class of randomized simultaneous acquisition matrices and demonstrate that sparsity-promoting recovery improves the quality of reconstructed seismic data volumes. We propose a practical randomized marine acquisition scheme where the sequential sources fire airguns at only randomly time-dithered instances. We demonstrate that the recovery using sparse approximation from random time-dithering with a single source approaches the recovery from simultaneous-source acquisition with multiple sources. Established findings from the field of compressive sensing indicate that the choice of the sparsifying transform that is incoherent with the compressive sampling matrix can significantly impact the reconstruction quality. Leveraging these findings, we then demonstrate that the compressive sampling matrix resulting from our proposed sampling scheme is incoherent with the curvelet transform. The combined measurement matrix exhibits better isometry properties than other transform bases such as a non-localized multidimensional Fourier transform. We illustrate our results with simulations of ‘ideal’ simultaneous-source marine acquisition, which dithers both in time and space, compared with periodic and randomized time-dithering.

[1]  C. Beasley,et al.  A New Look At Simultaneous Sources , 1998 .

[2]  Hart F. Smith A Hardy space for Fourier integral operators , 1998 .

[3]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Designing Simultaneous Acquisitions with Compressive Sensing , 2009 .

[4]  Yi Luo,et al.  Simultaneous Sources Separation Via Multi-Directional Vector-Median Filter , 2009 .

[5]  Max Deffenbaugh,et al.  Efficient seismic forward modeling using simultaneous random sources and sparsity , 2008 .

[6]  Lexing Ying,et al.  3D discrete curvelet transform , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[7]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[8]  A. Berkhout Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition , 2008 .

[9]  Claudio Bagaini Overview of Simultaneous Vibroseis Acquisition Methods , 2006 .

[10]  James Rickett,et al.  Simultaneous Source Separation By Sparse Radon Transform , 2008 .

[11]  E. Candès,et al.  The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse , 2004, math/0407210.

[12]  Claudio Bagaini,et al.  Dithered slip‐sweep acquisition , 2010 .

[13]  Gerrit Blacquière,et al.  Survey design for blended acquisition , 2009 .

[14]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Craig J. Beasley,et al.  A new look at marine simultaneous sources , 2008 .

[16]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[17]  Gerrit Blacquière,et al.  Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise , 2011 .

[18]  Paul L. Donoho,et al.  Development of seismic data compression methods for reliable, low‐noise, performance , 1999 .

[19]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Michael Elad,et al.  From Sparse Solutions of Systems of Equations to Sparse Modeling of Signals and Images , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[21]  Max Deffenbaugh,et al.  Efficient seismic forward modeling using simultaneous random sources and sparsity , 2010 .

[22]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Non-linear primary-multiple separation with directional curvelet frames , 2007 .

[23]  Gary Hampson,et al.  Acquisition using simultaneous sources , 2008 .

[24]  G. Hampson,et al.  Acquisition Using Simultaneous Sources , 2007 .

[25]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Kronecker Compressive Sensing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Randomized sampling and sparsity: Getting more information from fewer samples , 2010 .

[27]  R. Abma,et al.  High Quality Separation of Simultaneous Sources by Sparse Inversion , 2010 .

[28]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Sparsity- and continuity-promoting seismic image recovery with curvelet frames , 2008 .

[29]  Bill Dragoset,et al.  Simultaneous Source Separation Using Dithered Sources , 2008 .

[30]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[32]  R. J. de Kok,et al.  A Universal Simultaneous Shooting Technique , 2002 .

[33]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[34]  I. Moore,et al.  Simultaneous Sources – Processing and Applications , 2010 .

[35]  K. P. Allen,et al.  High Fidelity Vibratory Seismic (HFVS) Method For Acquiring Seismic Data , 1998 .

[36]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Compressive simultaneous full-waveform simulation , 2009 .