Standard topological quasi-varieties

This study addresses a problem which lies at the confluence of algebra, topology and mathematical logic. It is motivated by the theory of natural dualities, which provides a tight connection between a quasi-variety generated by a finite algebra M and the topological quasi-variety generated by a related topological structure ∼ . We introduce the notion of a standard topological quasi-variety and initiate a program of study to determine which topological quasi-varieties are standard and which are not. We say that a topological quasi-variety is standard if, in an appropriate sense, there is a nice axiomatic description of its members. Knowing in advance that it is standard allows us to recognize its members by looking only at their finite substructures. Let M∼ = 〈M ; G, H, R, T 〉 be a finite structure with operations G, partial operations H, relations R and discrete topology T. The topological quasi-variety generated by M∼ is the category QT(M∼ ) := IScP + M∼ of isomorphic copies of topologically closed substructures of non-zero direct powers, with the product topology, of M∼ . Interest in topological quasi-varieties stems from the fact that they arise as the duals to algebraic quasi-varieties under natural dualities, and the name comes from their obvious structural similarity to algebraic quasi-varieties. (See Clark and Davey [4], Clark and Krauss [5].) A natural duality is a special kind of dual equivalence between the quasi-variety Q(M) := ISPM generated by a finite algebra M and a topological quasi-variety QT(M∼ ) = IScP + M∼ generated by a structure M∼ having the same underlying set as M. The general theory of natural dualities provides methods to produce, from the algebra M, a structure M∼ that will yield a natural duality on Q(M). 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 08C15, 08A60, 03B99, 06D50, 22A30.

[1]  Albert Stralka A partially ordered space which is not a priestley space , 1980 .

[2]  A SCHIZOPHRENIC OPERATION WHICH AIDS THE EFFICIENT TRANSFER OF STRONG DUALITIES , 2000 .

[3]  Dualities for Stone algebras, double Stone algebras, and relative Stone algebras , 1982 .

[4]  Hajnal Andréka,et al.  Generalization of the concept of variety and quasivariety to partial algebras through category theory , 1983 .

[5]  When is a natural duality ‘good’? , 1996 .

[6]  G. Grätzer,et al.  A Note on the Implicational Class Generated by a Class of Structures , 1973, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin.

[7]  William H. Cornish,et al.  Coproducts of De Morgan algebras , 1977, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society.

[8]  Optimal natural dualities. II: General theory , 1996 .

[9]  T. Hu On the topological duality for primal algebra theory , 1971 .

[10]  Brian A. Davey,et al.  Optimal natural dualities for varieties of Heyting algebras , 1996, Stud Logica.

[11]  Endoprimal distributive lattices are endodualisable , 1995 .

[12]  David M. Clark,et al.  Natural Dualities for the Working Algebraist , 1998 .

[13]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  Median algebras , 1983, Discret. Math..

[14]  Miroslav Haviar,et al.  The Syntax and Semantics of Entailment in Duality Theory , 1995, J. Symb. Log..

[15]  M. Stone The theory of representations for Boolean algebras , 1936 .

[16]  Hilary A. Priestley,et al.  Representation of Distributive Lattices by means of ordered Stone Spaces , 1970 .

[17]  George F. McNulty,et al.  Fragments of first order logic, I: universal Horn logic , 1977, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[18]  Brian A. Davey,et al.  OPTIMAL NATURAL DUALITIES , 1993 .