An alternative paradigm for data evaluation in remote sensing using multisensor data fusion

In remote sensing, image data are evaluated according to different concepts. From a scientific point of view the goal of the evaluation often is to extract as much information as possible from a given data set. For practical applications the goal is rather to obtain information as efficiently as possible and as reliably as necessary. Starting with these observations the paper discusses and contrasts two paradigms for data evaluation: the first one aiming at enhanced data evaluation, and the second one with the goal of effective information extraction. It argues that under the second paradigm multisensor data fusion is very advantageous. In the near future, an increasing amount of multisensor data will be provided by satellite-borne as well as airborne platforms. As at the same time practical applications of remote sensing will become more widespread than in the past, the second paradigm for data evaluation is increasingly important. Consequently, there will be an increasing need for approaches and algorithms for data fusion.

[1]  F. Sansò,et al.  Optimization and design of geodetic networks , 1985 .

[2]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Knowledge-based land-cover classification using ERS-1/JERS-1 SAR composites , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Application of a Bayesian Network in a GIS Based Decision Making System , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Isabelle Bloch Information combination operators for data fusion: a comparative review with classification , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  A. Lopes,et al.  A statistical and geometrical edge detector for SAR images , 1988 .

[6]  Olaf Hellwich,et al.  Multisensor data fusion for automated scene interpretation , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[7]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Detection of linear features in SAR images: application to road network extraction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Sensor fusion potential exploitation-innovative architectures and illustrative applications , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Harald Ganster,et al.  Active fusion - A new method applied to remote sensing image interpretation , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[11]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .

[12]  Achim Roth,et al.  Mosaicking of Digital Elevation Models derived by SAR Interferometry , 1998 .

[13]  Shih-Tseng Wu,et al.  Analysis of synthetic aperture radar data acquired over a variety of land cover , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  R. Carande,et al.  Neural network classification with IFSAR and multispectral data fusion , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[15]  Yves Demazeau,et al.  Principles and techniques for sensor data fusion , 1993, Signal Process..

[16]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Topographic mapping from interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations , 1986 .

[17]  James Llinas,et al.  An introduction to multisensor data fusion , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[19]  Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos,et al.  Application of self-organizing neural networks to multi-radar data fusion , 1997 .

[20]  Stéphane Houzelle,et al.  Interpretation of remotely sensed images in a context of multisensor fusion using a multispecialist architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  C. Werner,et al.  Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping , 1988 .

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Mario Costantini,et al.  A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..