Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids.

The effect of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) on speech discrimination was measured for two types of hearing-aid amplification, (1) full-range multichannel compression with eight independent frequency bands and (2) frequency-equalized linear amplification. Signal-to-noise ratios from -5 to 15 dB with speech-spectrum noise (at 70 dB SPL) and two voices (male and female) were used. The effect of S/N differed for the two aid types: As the S/N decreased, speech discrimination became relatively better with the multichannel compression hearing aid (MCCHA) in comparison to the linear amplification hearing aid (LAHA). Furthermore, this shift in MCCHA-LAHA performance occurred for every subject, independent of which aid produced better overall performance. Of 16 hearing-impaired subjects, 7 showed significantly better overall speech discrimination with the MCCHA than with the LAHA, 5 showed no difference, and 4 showed significantly better discrimination with the LAHA. Hearing-loss severity and MCCHA performance also were related: Subjects with less severe impairments showed greater improvement with the MCCHA. In a normal-hearing listener, the speech discrimination deficit produced by these MCCHAs was small and not statistically significant in most cases. Taken together, these results indicate that a full-range eight-channel MCCHA, for a mild to moderately severe hearing loss, causes little information degradation and can be of great benefit for speech discrimination in noise, particularly at low S/N.

[1]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Learning effects with a closed response set nonsense syllable test , 1982 .

[2]  P Yanick Effects of signal processing on intelligibility of speech in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1976, Journal of the American Audiology Society.

[3]  Marilyn D. Wang SINFA: Multivariate uncertainty analysis for confusion matrices , 1976 .

[4]  E Villchur,et al.  Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E W Yund,et al.  Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  E Villchur,et al.  Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  E Villchur Electronic models to simulate the effect of sensory distortions on speech perception by the deaf. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Yund Ew,et al.  Discrimination of multichannel-compressed speech in noise: long-term learning in hearing-impaired subjects , 1995 .

[11]  E W Yund,et al.  Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  White Mw Compression systems for hearing aids and cochlear prostheses. , 1986 .