Shape comparison using perturbing shape registration

Shape registration is often involved in computing statistical differences between groups of shapes, which is a key aspect of morphometric study. The results of shape difference are found to be sensitive to registration, i.e., different registration methods lead to varied results. This raises the question of how to improve the reliability of registration procedures. This paper proposes a perturbation scheme, which perturbs registrations by feeding them with different resampled shape groups, and then aggregates the resulting shape differences. Experiments are conducted using three typical registration algorithms on both synthetic and biomedical shapes, where more reliable inter-group shape differences are found under the proposed scheme.

[1]  Rhodri H. Davies,et al.  Learning Shape: Optimal Models for Analysing Natural Variability , 2004 .

[2]  T. Heimann,et al.  Implementing the Automatic Generation of 3 D Statistical Shape Models with ITK Release , 2006 .

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[5]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[6]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Detection and analysis of statistical differences in anatomical shape , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Weighted Fourier Series Representation and Its Application to Quantifying the Amount of Gray Matter , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[9]  Thomas G. Dietterich Multiple Classifier Systems , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Polina Golland,et al.  Permutation Tests for Classification: Towards Statistical Significance in Image-Based Studies , 2003, IPMI.

[11]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Shape registration in implicit spaces using information theory and free form deformations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Unsupervised learning of an Atlas from unlabeled point-sets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Hans Henrik Thodberg,et al.  Minimum Description Length Shape and Appearance Models , 2003, IPMI.

[15]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Cortical Surface Shape Analysis Based on Spherical Wavelets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Performance Issues in Shape Classification , 2002, MICCAI.

[17]  Nick Barnes,et al.  A Study of Hippocampal Shape Difference Between Genders by Efficient Hypothesis Test and Discriminative Deformation , 2007, MICCAI.

[18]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[19]  Richard Ansorge Medical Image Registration: A Quick Win , 2008 .