Computer-Tailored Student Support in Introductory Physics

Large introductory courses are at a disadvantage in providing personalized guidance and advice for students during the semester. We introduce E2Coach (an Expert Electronic Coaching system), which allows instructors to personalize their communication with thousands of students. We describe the E2Coach system, the nature of the personalized support it provides, and the features of the students who did (and did not) opt-in to using it during the first three terms of its use in four introductory physics courses at the University of Michigan. Defining a ‘better-than-expected’ measure of performance, we compare outcomes for students who used E2Coach to those who did not. We found that moderate and high E2Coach usage was associated with improved performance. This performance boost was prominent among high users, who improved by 0.18 letter grades on average when compared to nonusers with similar incoming GPAs. This improvement in performance was comparable across both genders. E2Coach represents one way to use technology to personalize education at scale, contributing to the move towards individualized learning that is becoming more attainable in the 21st century.

[1]  Thomas A. Keenan Computers and education , 1964, CACM.

[2]  W. Reynolds Measurement of Academic Self-Concept in College Students , 1988 .

[3]  Steven J. Gerardi Academic self-concept as a predictor of academic success among minority and low-socioeconomic status students. , 1990 .

[4]  V. Strecher,et al.  The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[5]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Learning style based innovations to improve retention of female engineering students in the Synthesis Coalition , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[6]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  Teresa Larkin-Hein,et al.  Research on learning style: applications in the physics and engineering classrooms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[8]  J. Brug,et al.  Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Health education research.

[9]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors , 2007 .

[10]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. , 2006 .

[11]  V. Strecher Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). , 2007, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[12]  S. Noar,et al.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Scott Freeman,et al.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[14]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  H de Vries,et al.  Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. , 2008, Health education research.

[16]  J. Brug,et al.  The Effectiveness of Tailored Feedback and Action Plans in an Intervention Addressing Multiple Health Behaviors , 2008, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[17]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Lauren E. Kost,et al.  Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics , 2009 .

[19]  J. E. West,et al.  Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap , 2009 .

[20]  Honors Senior Thesis , 2010 .

[21]  Kate Miller,et al.  Better Than Expected: Using Learning Analytics to Promote Student Success in Gateway Science , 2014 .