Association of BRCA1/2defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes

IntroductionHomologous recombination (HR) DNA repair is of clinical relevance in breast cancer. Three DNA-based homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores (HRD-loss of heterozygosity score (LOH), HRD-telomeric allelic imbalance score (TAI), and HRD-large-scale state transition score (LST)) have been developed that are highly correlated with defects in BRCA1/2, and are associated with response to platinum therapy in triple negative breast and ovarian cancer. This study examines the frequency of BRCA1/2 defects among different breast cancer subtypes, and the ability of the HRD scores to identify breast tumors with defects in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway.Methods215 breast tumors representing all ER/HER2 subtypes were obtained from commercial vendors. Next-generation sequencing based assays were used to generate genome wide SNP profiles, BRCA1/2 mutation screening, and BRCA1 promoter methylation data.ResultsBRCA1/2 deleterious mutations were observed in all breast cancer subtypes. BRCA1 promoter methylation was observed almost exclusively in triple negative breast cancer. BRCA1/2 deficient tumors were identified with BRCA1/2 mutations, or BRCA1 promoter methylation, and loss of the second allele of the affected gene. All three HRD scores were highly associated with BRCA1/2 deficiency (HRD-LOH: P = 1.3 × 10-17; HRD-TAI: P = 1.5 × 10-19; HRD-LST: P = 3.5 × 10-18). A combined score (HRD-mean) was calculated using the arithmetic mean of the three scores. In multivariable analyses the HRD-mean score captured significant BRCA1/2 deficiency information not captured by the three individual scores, or by clinical variables (P values for HRD-Mean adjusted for HRD-LOH: P = 1.4 × 10-8; HRD-TAI: P = 2.9 × 10-7; HRD-LST: P = 2.8 × 10-8; clinical variables: P = 1.2 × 10-16).ConclusionsThe HRD scores showed strong correlation with BRCA1/2 deficiency regardless of breast cancer subtype. The frequency of elevated scores suggests that a significant proportion of all breast tumor subtypes may carry defects in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. The HRD scores can be combined to produce a more robust predictor of HRD. The combination of a robust score, and the FFPE compatible assay described in this study, may facilitate use of agents targeting homologous recombination DNA repair in the clinical setting.

[1]  L. Tsui,et al.  A suggested nomenclature for designating mutations , 1993, Human mutation.

[2]  G. Mills,et al.  Incidence and Outcome of BRCA Mutations in Unselected Patients with Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  William D. Foulkes,et al.  Re: Germline BRCA1 Mutations and a Basal Epithelial Phenotype in Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[4]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Mills,et al.  Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[7]  Christopher I Amos,et al.  Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  L. Bégin,et al.  Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Genetic Alterations and Oncogenic Pathways Associated with Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2009, Molecular Cancer Research.

[11]  S. Narod,et al.  Promoter methylation of BRCA1 in triple-negative breast cancer predicts sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  K. Offit,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Jewish women with triple negative breast cancer , 2008 .

[13]  Kirstin C. Jensen,et al.  Abstract PD09-04: Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) score predicts pathologic response following neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy in triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer (BC) , 2012 .

[14]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[15]  R. Wenstrup,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple‐negative breast cancer , 2012, Cancer.

[16]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. , 2012, Cancer discovery.