Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless.

Sexual isolation is a critical form of reproductive isolation in the early stages of animal speciation, yet little is known about the genetic basis of divergent mate preferences and preference cues in young species. Heliconius butterflies, well known for their diversity of wing color patterns, mate assortatively as a result of divergence in male preference for wing patterns. Here we show that the specific cue used by Heliconius cydno and Heliconius pachinus males to recognize conspecific females is the color of patches on the wings. In addition, male mate preference segregates with forewing color in hybrids, indicating a genetic association between the loci responsible for preference and preference cue. Quantitative trait locus mapping places a preference locus coincident with the locus that determines forewing color, which itself is perfectly linked to the wing patterning candidate gene, wingless. Furthermore, yellow-colored males of the polymorphic race H. cydno alithea prefer to court yellow females, indicating that wing color and color preference are controlled by loci that are located in an inversion or are pleiotropic effects of a single locus. Tight genetic associations between preference and preference cue, although rare, make divergence and speciation particularly likely because the effects of natural and sexual selection on one trait are transferred to the other, leading to the coordinated evolution of mate recognition. This effect of linkage on divergence is especially important in Heliconius because differentiation of wing color patterns in the genus has been driven and maintained by natural selection for Müllerian mimicry.

[1]  Rodrigo Venturoso Mendes Genetica , 2012, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[2]  J. Johnston,et al.  A Genetic Linkage Map of the Mimetic Butterfly Heliconius melpomene , 2005, Genetics.

[3]  R. Butlin Recombination and speciation , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[4]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  First-generation linkage map of the warningly colored butterfly Heliconius erato , 2005, Heredity.

[5]  S. Via,et al.  Back to the future: genetic correlations, adaptation and speciation , 2005, Genetica.

[6]  T. Mackay,et al.  Quantitative Trait Loci for Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana , 2004, Genetics.

[7]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  D. Schluter,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT OF MALE STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCE: REINFORCEMENT OR DIRECT SELECTION? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  M. Noor,et al.  Recombination and the Divergence of Hybridizing Species , 2002, Genetica.

[10]  J. Mallet,et al.  Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation , 2003, Evolution & development.

[11]  C. A. Machado,et al.  Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  R. Voorrips MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. , 2002, The Journal of heredity.

[13]  M. Noor,et al.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Servedio,et al.  BEYOND REINFORCEMENT: THE EVOLUTION OF PREMATING ISOLATION BY DIRECT SELECTION ON PREFERENCES AND POSTMATING, PREZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  David J. Hawthorne,et al.  Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids , 2001, Nature.

[16]  L H. Rieseberg,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  James Mallet,et al.  Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[19]  L. Chittka,et al.  The evolution of color vision in insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[20]  Roeland E. Voorrips,et al.  Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps , 2001 .

[21]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  G. Roderick,et al.  Endless Forms – Species and Speciation , 2000, Heredity.

[23]  Keith A. Gardner,et al.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. , 1999, Genetics.

[24]  Daniel J. Howard,et al.  Endless Forms: Species and Speciation , 1998 .

[25]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The evolutionary genetics of speciation. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  J. Mallet,et al.  What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Doerge,et al.  Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. , 1996, Genetics.

[28]  F. Maytag Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[29]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process , 1995 .

[30]  J. Feder,et al.  Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Sederoff,et al.  Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross: mapping strategy and RAPD markers. , 1994, Genetics.

[32]  S. Carroll,et al.  Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. , 1994, Science.

[33]  F. Sperling SEX-LINKED GENES AND SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN LEPIDOPTERA , 1994, The Canadian Entomologist.

[34]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns , 1991 .

[36]  R. Butlin,et al.  Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? , 1989 .

[37]  H. A. Orr,et al.  PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  N. Barton,et al.  STRONG NATURAL SELECTION IN A WARNING‐COLOR HYBRID ZONE , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[40]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Genetics and the Evolution of Muellerian Mimicry in Heliconius Butterflies , 1985 .

[41]  R. Lande The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[42]  R R Hoy,et al.  Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. , 1977, Science.

[43]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[44]  B. Linzen The Tryptophan → Omrnochrome Pathway in Insects1 , 1974 .

[45]  W. W. Benson Natural Selection for Miillerian Mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica , 1972, Science.

[46]  C. Pigott Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1959, Nature.

[47]  Dobzhansk y GENETICS AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES , 1940 .

[48]  T. Cockerell,et al.  Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .

[49]  Sarah Mae Sincero Heredity , 1875, Nature.