Evaluation of a chest radiograph reading and recording system for tuberculosis in a HIV-positive cohort.

AIM To assess the impact of introducing a chest radiograph reading and recording system (CRRS) with a short training session, on the accuracy and inter-reader variability of tuberculosis (TB) interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) by a group of non-expert readers in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS A set of 139 CXRs was reviewed by a group of eight physicians pre- and post-intervention at two clinics in Shan State, Myanmar, providing HIV/TB diagnosis and treatment services. The results were compared against the consensus of expert radiologists for accuracy. RESULTS Overall accuracy was similar pre- and post-intervention for most physicians with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve difference of 0.02 (95% confidence interval: -0.03, 0.07). The overall agreement among physicians was poor pre- and post-intervention (Fleiss κ=0.35 and κ=0.29 respectively). The assessment of agreement for specific disease patterns associated with active TB in HIV-infected patients showed that for intrinsically subtle findings, the agreement was generally poor but better for the more intrinsically obvious disease patterns: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa range = 0.37-0.67) and milliary nodular pattern (Cohen's kappa range = 0.25-0.52). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated limited impact of the introduction of a CRRS on CXR accuracy and agreement amongst non-expert readers. The role in which CXRs are used for TB diagnosis in a HIV-positive cohort in similar clinical contexts should be reviewed.

[1]  K. Steingart,et al.  Scoring systems using chest radiographic features for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  R. Atun,et al.  Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  P. Lobue,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis by specialists and non-specialists. , 2009, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[4]  E. Faragher,et al.  The effect of a tuberculosis chest X-ray image reference set on non-expert reader performance , 2013, European Radiology.

[5]  E. Bateman,et al.  Chest radiograph reading and recording system: evaluation for tuberculosis screening in patients with advanced HIV. , 2010, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[6]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[7]  S. Andronikou,et al.  Quality assessment of X-rays interpreted via teleradiology for Médecins Sans Frontières , 2014, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  M. Borgdorff,et al.  High sensitivity of chest radiograph reading by clinical officers in a tuberculosis prevalence survey. , 2011, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[9]  P. Kilmarx,et al.  Tuberculosis in asymptomatic HIV-infected adults with abnormal chest radiographs screened for tuberculosis prevention. , 2010, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[10]  Michael Kawooya,et al.  Clinical and Radiographic Factors Do Not Accurately Diagnose Smear-Negative Tuberculosis in HIV-infected Inpatients in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  G. Swingler,et al.  Observer variation in detecting lymphadenopathy on chest radiography. , 2002, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[12]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Computing Sample Size for Receiver Operating Characteristic Studies , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[13]  L. Gabbasova,et al.  Global tuberculosis report (2014) , 2014 .

[14]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  M Mars,et al.  A simple telemedicine system using a digital camera , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  H Meme,et al.  The role and performance of chest X-ray for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Nairobi, Kenya , 2005, BMC infectious diseases.

[17]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Acaricidal Activity of Eugenol Based Compounds against Scabies Mites , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Jr Young Tuberculosis: Case Finding and Chemotherapy: Questions and Answers , 1981 .

[19]  E. Bateman,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new chest radiograph reading and recording system for epidemiological surveys of tuberculosis and lung disease. , 2005, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[20]  P. Klatser,et al.  Sex-specific performance of routine TB diagnostic tests. , 2005, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[21]  P. Goussard,et al.  Teaching chest X-ray reading for child tuberculosis suspects. , 2014, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[22]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[23]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.