A Strategy for Opening a New Market and Encroaching on the Lower End of the Existing Market

We identify and analyze a scenario where a firm first opens up what we call a “detached” market, by offering a new product that meets a customer need that is very different from (i.e., detached from) the need met by the old established product. Our analysis builds on the previous studies that describe alternate ways in which a new product might open a new market and ultimately encroach on an existing market. Consider the example of cell phones: They opened up a new detached market by meeting the customer need for mobility, a need very different from the traditional attribute of reception quality. By meeting an important detached need, a new product can sell at a high price, even though it might be woefully deficient with regard to the traditional performance dimension (the reception/coverage of early cell phones was sorely lacking). A person who is a high-end customer for the old product initially despises the new product as a replacement for the old one but might simultaneously be one of the first customers for the new product because it fills the detached-market need. Over time, the new product improves along the traditional dimension (e.g., cell phone reception/coverage has dramatically improved), and eventually it becomes a replacement for the old product, encroaching from the lower end upward (the first customers to drop their landlines have been lower-end customers such as students and apartment dwellers, whereas higher-end business customers still have landlines in their offices). We call this the detached-market form of low-end encroachment and show how it helps explain the conundrum of an expensive “disruptive” innovation. We go on to relate our results to the finding that “willingness to cannibalize” is a key factor in an incumbent firm's growth and survival, and to the “blue ocean strategy.”

[1]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[4]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[5]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[6]  E. DiMingo The fine art of positioning. , 1988, Journal of Business Strategy.

[7]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[8]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Impact of a Late Entrant on the Diffusion of a New Product/Service , 2000 .

[9]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  On hotelling's "Stability in competition" , 1979 .

[10]  Ron Adner,et al.  Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition , 2003 .

[11]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  Defeating feature fatigue. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[12]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[13]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[14]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  J. C. Fisher,et al.  A simple substitution model of technological change , 1971 .

[16]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  HOW LEGACY FIRMS CAN INTRODUCE RADICAL AND DISRUPTIVE INNOVATIONS: THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSES. , 2004 .

[17]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  The Impact of an Integrated Marketing and Manufacturing Innovation , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[19]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  The Great Disruption , 2001 .

[20]  E. Dahan,et al.  The predictive power of internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation , 2000 .

[21]  Kamalini Ramdas MANAGING PRODUCT VARIETY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2003 .

[22]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Operationalizing technology improvements in product development decision-making , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation , 2001 .

[24]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  R&D, Marketing, and the Success of Next-Generation Products , 2003 .

[25]  Gary Hamel,et al.  Funding growth in an age of austerity. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[26]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Aneel Karnani,et al.  Generic competitive strategies—An analytical approach , 1984 .

[28]  Jeffrey T. Macher,et al.  “Managing” Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2003 .

[29]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[30]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[31]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[32]  Cheryl T. Druehl,et al.  Changes in Product Attributes and Costs as Drivers of New Product Diffusion and Substitution , 2005 .

[33]  P. Ghemawat Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia , 1991 .

[34]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[35]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Seeing What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change , 2005 .

[36]  C. Gilbert Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[37]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Diffusion of New Products: Empirical Generalizations and Managerial Uses , 1995 .

[38]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[39]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  Can Incumbents Introduce Radical and Disruptive Innovations? (04-100) , 2004 .

[40]  Rebecca Henderson The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence , 2006 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[42]  Clayton M. Christensen The innovator's challenge : understanding the influence of market environment on processes of technology development in the rigid disk drive industry , 1992 .

[43]  Cheryl T. Druehl,et al.  When Is a Disruptive Innovation Disruptive , 2008 .

[44]  F. Bass,et al.  A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products , 1987 .

[45]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[46]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[48]  Ron Adner When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[49]  Vish Krishnan,et al.  Designing a Family of Development-Intensive Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[51]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.