Quantitative analysis of the factors that affect the determination of colocalization coefficients in dual-color confocal images

Colocalization analysis is a subject of great interest that allows us to determine those locations at which two or more types of molecules or structures are found simultaneously. In confocal dual-color images, in order to consider a given position as colocalized, the following two conditions must be satisfied: 1) the colors emitted by the molecules labeled with different fluorophores must occupy the same pixel in the image and 2) the intensities of each component of the image must be within a certain range. Since it is not straightforward to assess these two conditions without ambiguity, this can lead to either considering false colocalizations as positive, or, conversely, leaving out positive locations. In fact, at present, there is not a general procedure to determine the area of colocalization that contains those pixels that can be considered as really colocalized (i.e., the pixels for which the above conditions are fulfilled). As a result, it is the user who must decide on the appropriate selection which introduces personal bias. These issues and the guides for a computational procedure independent of the user that allows us to quantify the degree of colocalization in a dual-color system are discussed.

[1]  J. Ritz,et al.  Characterization of a cell line, NKL, derived from an aggressive human natural killer cell leukemia. , 1996, Experimental hematology.

[2]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[3]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[4]  Y. Henis,et al.  Co‐localization analysis of complex formation among membrane proteins by computerized fluorescence microscopy: application to immunofluorescence co‐patching studies , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  David H. Schwartz,et al.  Actin-Dependent Receptor Colocalization Required for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Entry into Host Cells , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[6]  Gonzalo Rubio,et al.  Cross‐linking of MHC class I molecules on human NK cells inhibits NK cell function, segregates MHC I from the NK cell synapse, and induces intracellular phosphotyrosines , 2004, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[7]  G. Schütz,et al.  Direct observation of ligand colocalization on individual receptor molecules. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[8]  A. Diaspro Confocal and two-photon microscopy : foundations, applications, and advances , 2001 .

[9]  H. Stockinger,et al.  GPI-microdomains: a role in signalling via immunoreceptors. , 1999, Immunology today.

[10]  P. D. Bell,et al.  Confocal and two-photon microscopy. , 2003, Methods in molecular medicine.

[11]  D. Demandolx,et al.  Multicolour analysis and local image correlation in confocal microscopy , 1997 .

[12]  John C. Russ,et al.  The image processing handbook (3. ed.) , 1995 .

[13]  C. Mineo,et al.  A detergent-free method for purifying caveolae membrane from tissue culture cells. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Aten,et al.  Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  S. M. Ibrahim,et al.  Cholesterol-dependent clustering of IL-2Ralpha and its colocalization with HLA and CD48 on T lymphoma cells suggest their functional association with lipid rafts. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Lachmann,et al.  Membrane defence against complement lysis: The structure and biological properties of CD59 , 1993, Immunologic research.

[17]  R. Parton,et al.  Ultrastructural localization of gangliosides; GM1 is concentrated in caveolae. , 1994, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.