Using GIS to Monitor and Investigate Police Use of Force: The Spatial Distribution of Force Factors

This chapter describes the potential utility of geospatial analysis as applied to monitoring, understanding, and responding to police use-of-force incidents . Data are drawn from 1,240 official use-of-force reports in the City of Seattle, representing a two and a quarter year period. Each report includes officer identifier information, suspect demographic information, a categorization of the type of suspect resistance and how force was applied, as well as information about location, booking, injuries, and evidence of impairment or suspected impairment. In addition to coding these administrative data elements, the authors coded the content of the officer narratives with regard to the nature of officer-suspect interactions as well as relevant Graham factors. Force and resistance levels were classified based on complementary scales drawing from previous research. All use-of-force data was attributed to geocoded incident locations. A series of maps and basic spatial statistics demonstrate how GIS can assist in understanding the nature and scope of police use of force and potentially improve the quality of police monitoring and accountability mechanisms.

[1]  J. Buckley Public transit and crime : a routine activities/ecological approach , 1997 .

[2]  Theodore H. Poister,et al.  Transit-Related Crime in Suburban Areas , 1996 .

[3]  M. White,et al.  Race, Ethnicity, and Policing: New and Essential Readings , 2010 .

[4]  R. Sampson The Place of Context: A Theory and Strategy for Criminology's Hard Problems , 2013 .

[5]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Police Patrol Effectiveness in Violent Crime Hotspots , 2011 .

[6]  Wilpen L. Gorr,et al.  GIS Tutorial for Crime Analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Stephen D. Mastrofski,et al.  POLICE DISRESPECT TOWARD THE PUBLIC: AN ENCOUNTER‐BASED ANALYSIS* , 2002 .

[8]  Jimmy J. Williams,et al.  Sheriff law enforcement officers and the use of force , 2003 .

[9]  Geoffrey P. Alpert,et al.  A Management Tool for Evaluating Police Use of Force: An Application of the Force Factor , 2003 .

[10]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  Hot Spots of Juvenile Crime: A Longitudinal Study of Arrest Incidents at Street Segments in Seattle, Washington , 2009 .

[11]  M. Tonry,et al.  Communities and Crime , 1989 .

[12]  Robert L. Kane,et al.  COLLECT AND RELEASE DATA ON COERCIVE POLICE ACTIONS , 2007 .

[13]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society , 1966 .

[14]  Geoffrey P. Alpert,et al.  Understanding Police Use of Force: Officers, Suspects, and Reciprocity , 2004 .

[15]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  TOWARD A NATIONAL ESTIMATE OF POLICE USE OF NONLETHAL FORCE , 2008 .

[16]  M. Hickman,et al.  Mapping Police Stress , 2011 .

[17]  William Terrill,et al.  Neighborhood Context and Police Use of Force , 2003 .

[18]  James J. Fyfe,et al.  Too Many Missing Cases: Holes in Our Knowledge about Police Use of Force , 2002 .

[19]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[20]  James F. Wilson,et al.  Varieties of Police Behavior , 1968 .

[21]  Robert L. Kane,et al.  THE SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF POLICE MISCONDUCT , 2002 .

[22]  Douglas A. Smith The Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[23]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots , 1995 .

[24]  M. Wolfgang,et al.  Delinquency in a birth cohort , 1972 .