Towards a robust CFD model for aeration tanks for sewage treatment – a lab-scale study

ABSTRACT Detailed insight into the hydrodynamics of aeration tanks is of crucial importance for improvements in treatment efficiency, optimization of the process design and energy-efficient operation. These factors have triggered increasing interest in the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to evaluate performance of wastewater treatment systems. Whilst factors such as incorrect input assumptions, poor model choice and excessive simplifications have been recognized as potential sources of output errors, there remains a need to identify the most robust strategy to faithfully simulate aeration tank performance. Therefore, the focus of this work was to undertake rigorous transient simulations of the hydrodynamics and oxygen mass transfer in a lab-scale aeration tank in order to work towards the development of robust modeling guidelines for activated sludge systems. Unlike most previous CFD analyses of aeration systems, the work reported here employed the shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model to account for the turbulent interactions between the phases inducing bubble breakup and/or coalescence, and as a consequence, promoting the formation of bubbles of different sizes and shapes. The results obtained were compared with those arising from an analysis using the standard () model – and assuming fixed bubble diameter- the most common CFD modeling framework used within the wastewater modeling community. Model validation was achieved using acoustic Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry techniques, and experimentally derived oxygen mass transfer data. Limitations of both turbulence models used and modeling assumptions concerning bubbly flow are discussed. The benefits of the SST turbulence model are demonstrated, but the need to balance the increased computational expense of this approach compared to the model and, indeed, bubble flow modeling are recognized. Thus, this paper presents the first rigorous analysis of turbulence model and bubble flow generation models together for activated sludge system optimization. Abbreviations: ADV: Acoustic Doppler velocimetry; AS: Activated sludge; ASM1: Activated Sludge Model No. 1; BOD: Biochemical oxygen demand; CCD: Charge-coupled device; CFD: Computational fluid dynamics; COD: Chemical oxygen demand; CPU: Central processing unit; DO: Dissolved oxygen; GCI: Grid convergence index; HPC: High performance computing; IAC: Interfacial area concentration; MRF: Multiple reference frame; MLSS: Mixed liquor suspended solids; PBM: Population balance models; PIV: Particle image velocimetry; PST: Phase-space thresholding; RAM: Random access memory; RANS: Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes; SNR: Signal-to-noise-ratio; SST: Shear stress transport

[1]  H. C. Simpson Bubbles, drops and particles , 1980 .

[2]  Anil Date,et al.  Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2023, essentials.

[3]  S. Pope Turbulent Flows: FUNDAMENTALS , 2000 .

[4]  Alexey N. Kochevsky Possibilities of Simulation of Fluid Flows Using the Modern CFD Software Tools , 2004 .

[5]  D. Fotiadis,et al.  Single and Two-Phase Flows on Chemical and Biomedical Engineering , 2012 .

[6]  Arnaud Cockx,et al.  In situ characterization of local hydrodynamic parameters in closed-loop aeration tanks , 2010 .

[7]  null null,et al.  Measurement of Oxygen Transfer in Clean Water , 2007 .

[8]  David Jenkins,et al.  Activated Sludge – 100 Years and Counting , 2014 .

[9]  J. Bridgeman,et al.  Despiking velocity time-series—Optimisation through the combination of spike detection and replacement methods , 2013 .

[10]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Despiking Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data , 2002 .

[11]  Rajeev Goel,et al.  Determination of diffuser bubble size in computational fluid dynamics models to predict oxygen transfer in spiral roll aeration tanks , 2016 .

[12]  John Bridgeman,et al.  CFD-aided modelling of activated sludge systems - A critical review. , 2016, Water research.

[13]  Z. Do-Quang,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to water and wastewater treatment facility modeling , 1998 .

[14]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[15]  M. Stenstrom,et al.  Theory to Practice: Oxygen Transfer and the New ASCE Standard , 2006 .

[16]  Ashfaq Shaikh,et al.  A Review on Flow Regime Transition in Bubble Columns , 2007 .

[17]  Anna Maria Karpinska Portela,et al.  New Design Tools for Activated Sludge Process , 2014 .

[18]  M. Honkanen,et al.  PIV Methods for Turbulent Bubbly Flow Measurements , 2004 .

[19]  Michael K. Stenstrom,et al.  Effects of alpha, beta and theta factor upon the design, specification and operation of aeration systems , 1981 .

[20]  Asce,et al.  Measurement of Oxygen Transfer in Clean Water , 1993 .

[21]  R. Mudde,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Gas-Liquid Reactors: Normal Operation and Upset Conditions , 2011 .

[22]  Alain Liné,et al.  Modeling of oxygen mass transfer in a gas–liquid airlift reactor , 2007 .

[23]  R. Higbie,et al.  The Rate of Absorption of a Pure Gas into a Still Liquid during Short Periods of Exposure , 1935 .

[24]  J. A. Mueller,et al.  Aeration: principles and practice. , 2002 .

[25]  Jérôme Morchain,et al.  A coupled population balance model and CFD approach for the simulation of mixing issues in lab-scale and industrial bioreactors , 2014 .

[26]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[27]  Rui A.R. Boaventura,et al.  Modeling of the hydrodynamics and energy expenditure of oxidation ditch aerated with hydrojets using CFD codes , 2015 .

[28]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Interfacial area transport equation: model development and benchmark experiments , 2002 .

[29]  David J. Reardon,et al.  Turning Down the Power , 1995 .

[30]  Z. Do-Quang,et al.  Global and local mass transfer coefficients in waste water treatment process by computational fluid dynamics , 2001 .

[31]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Interfacial Area Transport , 2006 .

[32]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): What is Good CFD- Modeling Practice and What Can Be the Added Value of CFD Models to WWTP Modeling? , 2012 .

[33]  William C. Boyle,et al.  Measurement of Oxygen Transfer in Clean Water , 2022 .

[34]  Jay Sanyal,et al.  A generalized approach to model oxygen transfer in bioreactors using population balances and computational fluid dynamics , 2005 .

[35]  J D Wicks,et al.  CFD for wastewater treatment: an overview. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  R. D. Vigil,et al.  Quadrature method of moments for aggregation-breakage processes. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[37]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  One-group interfacial area transport of bubbly flows in vertical round tubes , 2000 .

[38]  Li Lei,et al.  Three-dimensional three-phase model for simulation of hydrodynamics, oxygen mass transfer, carbon oxidation, nitrification and denitrification in an oxidation ditch. , 2014, Water research.

[39]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Bubbly Flows: Analysis, Modelling and Calculation , 2012 .

[40]  Takuma Suzuki,et al.  Noise of Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data in Bubbly Flows , 2007 .

[41]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[42]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Estimation of power spectra of acoustic-doppler velocimetry data contaminated with intermittent spikes , 2010 .

[43]  M. Hounslow,et al.  A discretized population balance for nucleation, growth, and aggregation , 1988 .

[44]  Colin D. Groff,et al.  Field and CFD Analysis of Jet Aeration and Mixing , 2012 .

[45]  Arnaud Cockx,et al.  Oxygen transfer prediction in aeration tanks using CFD , 2007 .

[46]  P. Roache Verification of Codes and Calculations , 1998 .

[47]  Tiefeng Wang,et al.  Simulation of bubble column reactors using CFD coupled with a population balance model , 2011 .

[48]  Yin Yang,et al.  Study on two operating conditions of a full-scale oxidation ditch for optimization of energy consumption and effluent quality by using CFD model. , 2011, Water Research.

[49]  J Alex,et al.  Modelling of aeration systems at wastewater treatment plants. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[50]  Lawrence L. Tavlarides,et al.  Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions , 1977 .

[51]  Y. L. Moullec,et al.  CFD simulation of the hydrodynamics and reactions in an activated sludge channel reactor of wastewater treatment , 2010 .

[52]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Good modelling practice in applying computational fluid dynamics for WWTP modelling. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[53]  Activated Sludge Models Coupled to CFD Simulations , 2012 .

[54]  M. Ishii,et al.  Micro four-sensor probe measurement of interfacial area transport for bubbly flow in round pipes , 2001 .

[55]  J. Bridgeman,et al.  Novel software developments for the automated post-processing of high volumes of velocity time-series , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[56]  Ismail Celik,et al.  Numerical Experiments on Application of Richardson Extrapolation With Nonuniform Grids , 1997 .

[57]  John Bridgeman,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Flocculation in Water Treatment: A Review , 2009 .

[58]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Population balance models: a useful complementary modelling framework for future WWTP modelling. , 2015, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[59]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  One-group interfacial area transport in vertical bubbly flow , 1998 .

[60]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[61]  N. Ratkovich Understanding hydrodynamics in membrane bioreactor systems for wastewater treatment: two-phase empirical and numerical modelling and experimental validation , 2010 .

[62]  A. Brucato,et al.  Particle drag coefficients in turbulent fluids , 1998 .

[63]  Daniel Braun,et al.  Effects of aeration patterns on the flow field in wastewater aeration tanks. , 2011, Water research.

[64]  康裕 岩澤,et al.  次世代燃料電池触媒開発のための in situ characterization , 2011 .

[65]  Marcos von Sperling,et al.  Basic Principles Of Wastewater Treatment , 2007 .

[66]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[67]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Hydrodynamic-biokinetic model integration applied to a full-scale WWTP , 2014 .