Facial nerve injury induces facilitation of responses in both trigeminal and facial nuclei of rat

A study was made of the effects of facial nerve transection on trigeminal stimulation- evoked field potentials in the principal trigeminal (Pr5) and facial nuclei (7) in rats. Although the transected branch of the facial nerve contains pure motoric efferents, it resulted in enhanced responses in both Pr5 and 7. These electrophysiological results suggest a functional circuitry involving the whiskers, trigeminal nerve, Pr5 and 7 and the facial nerve as efferent. The disconnection (opening) of this loop results in enhanced responsiveness of the neurons in both Pr5 and 7.

[1]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Dynamic representational plasticity in sensory cortex , 2002, Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Vidal,et al.  Modulation of the voltage-gated sodium- and calcium-dependent potassium channels in rat vestibular and facial nuclei after unilateral labyrinthectomy and facial nerve transsection: an in situ hybridization study , 2003, Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Wolff,et al.  Facial nerve injury produces a latent somatosensory input through recruitment of the motor cortex in the rat. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[4]  M. D. Egger,et al.  The facial “motor” nerve of the rat: Control of vibrissal movement and examination of motor and sensory components , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Dynamic organization of primary motor cortex output to target muscles in adult rats II. Rapid reorganization following motor nerve lesions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  P. Vidal,et al.  Modulation of the β1–3 voltage-gated sodium channels in rat vestibular and facial nuclei after unilateral labyrinthectomy and facial nerve section: an in situ hybridization study , 2003 .

[8]  J. Wolff,et al.  Activation of the primary motor cortex by somatosensory stimulation in adult rats is mediated mainly by associational connections from the somatosensory cortex , 1999, Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Wolff,et al.  Facial nerve lesions lead to increased immunostaining of the astrocytic gap junction protein (connexin 43) in the corresponding facial nucleus of rats , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  M. Deschenes,et al.  The Relay of High-Frequency Sensory Signals in the Whisker-to-Barreloid Pathway , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Wolff,et al.  Biphasic reorganization of somatotopy in the primary motor cortex follows facial nerve lesions in adult rats , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  D Kleinfeld,et al.  Anatomical loops and their electrical dynamics in relation to whisking by rat. , 1999, Somatosensory & motor research.

[13]  J. Wolff,et al.  Facial nerve injury‐induced disinhibition in the primary motor cortices of both hemispheres , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  A. Keller,et al.  Functional circuitry involved in the regulation of whisker movements , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Rune W. Berg,et al.  Coherent electrical activity between vibrissa sensory areas of cerebellum and neocortex is enhanced during free whisking. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Toldi,et al.  Comparative study of the neuronal plasticity along the neuraxis of the vibrissal sensory system of adult rat following unilateral infraorbital nerve damage and subsequent regeneration , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  G. Paxinos.  The Rat nervous system , 1985 .

[18]  J. Wolff,et al.  Astrocytes as rapid sensors of peripheral axotomy in the facial nucleus of rats. , 1994, Neuroreport.