High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement: A cause for concern.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Schmalzried,et al. Techniques for improving the initial strength of the tibial tray‐cement interface bond , 2019, The bone & joint journal.
[2] P. Bonutti,et al. Unusually High Rate of Early Failure of Tibial Component in ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System at Implant–Cement Interface , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.
[3] K. Hazelwood,et al. Case series report: Early cement-implant interface fixation failure in total knee replacement. , 2015, The Knee.
[4] J. Parvizi,et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[5] A. Lombardi,et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[6] S. Bini,et al. Does pre-coating total knee tibial implants affect the risk of aseptic revision? , 2013, The bone & joint journal.
[7] M. Pagnano,et al. Aseptic Tibial Debonding as a Cause of Early Failure in a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Design , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[8] S. Sporer,et al. Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[9] N. Mahomed,et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.