Theory of visual attention thalamic model for visual short-term memory capacity and top-down control: Evidence from a thalamo-cortical structural connectivity analysis

In the theory of visual attention (TVA), it is suggested that objects in a visual scene compete for representation in a visual short-term memory (vSTM) store. The race towards the store is assumed to be biased by top-down controlled weighting of the objects according to their task relevance. Only objects that reach the store before its capacity limitation is reached are represented consciously in a given instant. TVA-based computational modeling of participants' performance in whole- and partial-report tasks permits independent parameters of individual efficiency of top-down control α and vSTM storage capacity K to be extracted. The neural interpretation of the TVA proposes recurrent loops between the posterior thalamus and posterior visual cortices to be relevant for generating attentional weights for competing objects and for maintaining selected objects in vSTM. Accordingly, we tested whether structural connectivity between posterior thalamus and occipital cortices (PT-OC) is associated with estimates of top-down control and vSTM capacity. We applied whole- and partial-report tasks and probabilistic tractography in a sample of 37 healthy adults. We found vSTM capacity K to be associated with left PT-OC structural connectivity and a trend-wise relation between top-down control α and right PT-OC structural connectivity. These findings support the assumption of the relevance of thalamic structures and their connections to visual cortex for top-down control and vSTM capacity.

[1]  David Whitney,et al.  Attention gates visual coding in the human pulvinar , 2012, Nature Communications.

[2]  Christian Sorg,et al.  Extensive and interrelated subcortical white and gray matter alterations in preterm-born adults , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[3]  R. Ramasubbu,et al.  Thalamocortical connectivity in major depressive disorder. , 2017, Journal of affective disorders.

[4]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Thalamic functions in distributed cognitive control , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Ben Jeurissen,et al.  Diffusion MRI fiber tractography of the brain , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  S. Kaplan The Physiology of Thought , 1950 .

[8]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Persisting asymmetries of vision after right side lesions , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Filtering of Distractors during Visual Search Studied by Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  Edward Awh,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA , 2011 .

[13]  G. Mangun,et al.  The role of the pulvinar in distractor processing and visual search , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[14]  R. Marois,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  M. Fox,et al.  Noninvasive functional and structural connectivity mapping of the human thalamocortical system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  The Pulvinar Regulates Information Transmission Between Cortical Areas Based on Attention Demands , 2012, Science.

[18]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  On Why Left Events are the Right Ones: Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Left-hemifield Advantage in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Spatio-temporal indications of sub-cortical involvement in leftward bias of spatial attention , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Rafal,et al.  Contributions of the human pulvinar to linking vision and action , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Constrained by Our Connections: White Matter's Key Role in Interindividual Variability in Visual Working Memory Capacity , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  I. Robertson,et al.  The Role of a Right Fronto-Parietal Network in Cognitive Control: Common Activations for Cues-to-Att , 2006 .

[24]  E. Benarroch Pulvinar , 2015, Neurology.

[25]  R. Elliott,et al.  Activation of Different Anterior Cingulate Foci in Association with Hypothesis Testing and Response Selection , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Measuring macroscopic brain connections in vivo , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Fronto-limbic microstructure and structural connectivity in remission from major depression , 2012, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[28]  Chun Meng,et al.  Impaired visual short-term memory capacity is distinctively associated with structural connectivity of the posterior thalamic radiation and the splenium of the corpus callosum in preterm-born adults , 2017, NeuroImage.

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  S Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  N. Makris,et al.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  David K. Yu,et al.  Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[35]  Christophe Phillips,et al.  Depression alters “top-down” visual attention: A dynamic causal modeling comparison between depressed and healthy subjects , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Impaired attentional selection following lesions to human pulvinar: Evidence for homology between human and monkey , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Thomas Habekost,et al.  Clinical TVA-based studies: a general review , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[39]  Chad J. Donahue,et al.  Using Diffusion Tractography to Predict Cortical Connection Strength and Distance: A Quantitative Comparison with Tracers in the Monkey , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Diffusion MRI of Complex Neural Architecture , 2003, Neuron.

[41]  Jennifer L. Whitwell,et al.  Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: A nuisance variable with less nuisance , 2015, NeuroImage.

[42]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Dissociable spatial and non-spatial attentional deficits after circumscribed thalamic stroke , 2015, Cortex.

[43]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Tractography: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2011, Brain Connect..

[48]  Wilsaan M. Joiner,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms for visual stability: progress and problems , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[51]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[52]  Cheuk Y. Tang,et al.  Thalamocortical circuits: fMRI assessment of the pulvinar and medial dorsal nucleus in normal volunteers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[53]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Testing attention: Comparing the ANT with TVA-based assessment , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[54]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Positron emission tomographic measurements of pulvinar activity during an attention task , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[55]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Structural Variability within Frontoparietal Networks and Individual Differences in Attentional Functions: An Approach Using the Theory of Visual Attention , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Three Key Regions for Supervisory Attentional Control: Evidence from Neuroimaging Meta-analyses , 2022 .

[57]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Robert Ward,et al.  The Effects of Unilateral Pulvinar Damage in Humans on Reflexive Orienting and Filtering of Irrelevant Information , 2002, Behavioural neurology.

[59]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Partial volume effect as a hidden covariate in DTI analyses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[61]  Kathrin Finke,et al.  Visual spatial and visual pattern working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for a differential role of left and right dorsal visual brain , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Visual attention capacity after right hemisphere lesions , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[64]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Usability of a theory of visual attention (TVA) for parameter-based measurement of attention I: Evidence from normal subjects , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[66]  Lars T. Westlye,et al.  TVA–based assessment of attentional capacities–associations with age and indices of brain white matter microstructure , 2014, Front. Psychol..