Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and trade-offs with a three-dimensional simulation model.

Sun and shade environments place markedly different constraints on the photosynthetic performance of plants. Leaf-level photosynthetic responses to sun and shade have been extensively investigated, whereas there has been much less research on the functional role of crown architecture in these environments. This paper focuses on the role of architecture in maximizing light capture and photosynthesis in shaded understories and in minimizing exposure to excess radiation in open high light environments. Understanding these contrasting roles of architecture is facilitated by application of a three-dimensional structural-functional model, Y-plant. Surveys of understory plants reveal a diversity of architectures but a strong convergence at only modest light-capture efficiencies because of significant self-shading. Simulations with Psychotria species revealed that increasing internode lengths would increase light-capture efficiencies and whole plant carbon gain. However, the costs of the additional required biomechanical support was high, which, in terms of relative growth rates, would override the advantage provided by higher light-capture efficiencies. In high light environments, leaf angles and self-shading provide structural photoprotection, minimizing potential damage from photoinhbition. Simulations reveal that without these structural protections photoinhibition of photosynthesis is likely to be much greater with daily carbon gain significantly reduced.

[1]  R. Ryel,et al.  Effects of photoinhibition on whole‐plant carbon gain assessed with a photosynthesis model , 2001 .

[2]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[3]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. II. Model testing and application in a Norway spruce stand , 1997 .

[4]  H. Honda,et al.  Tree Branch Angle: Maximizing Effective Leaf Area , 1978, Science.

[5]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data , 2002 .

[6]  Akira Osawa,et al.  Measurement of three‐dimensional structure of plants with a simple device and estimation of light capture of individual leaves , 1998 .

[7]  K. Niklas Morphological evolution through complex domains of fitness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Baldocchi An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[9]  M. Tyree,et al.  Water Relations and Hydraulic Architecture of a Tropical Tree (Schefflera morototoni) : Data, Models, and a Comparison with Two Temperate Species (Acer saccharum and Thuja occidentalis). , 1991, Plant physiology.

[10]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Modeling the architecture of expanding Fraxinus pennsylvanica shoots using L-systems , 1994 .

[11]  F. Valladares,et al.  The geometry of light interception by shoots of Heteromeles arbutifolia: morphological and physiological consequences for individual leaves , 1999, Oecologia.

[12]  B. Demmig‐Adams,et al.  The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis , 1996 .

[13]  C. Osmond What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants , 1994 .

[14]  H. Muraoka,et al.  Leaf display and photosynthesis of tree seedlings in a cool-temperate deciduous broadleaf forest understorey , 2003, Oecologia.

[15]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  The functional ecology of shoot architecture in sun and shade plants of Heteromeles arbutifolia M. Roem., a Californian chaparral shrub , 1998, Oecologia.

[16]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  A three-dimensional crown architecture model for assessment of light capture and carbon gain by understory plants , 1996, Oecologia.

[17]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  The functional morphology of light capture and carbon gain in the Redwood forest understorey plant Adenocaulon bicolor Hook , 1998 .

[18]  K. Niklas,et al.  Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants , 1995 .

[19]  F. Valladares,et al.  A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species: do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth? , 2004, Oecologia.

[20]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[21]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Foliage determinants of light interception in sunny and shaded branches of Fagus sylvatica (L.) , 1998 .

[22]  M. Sjöström,et al.  Estimation of the effect of photoinhibition on the carbon gain in leaves of a willow canopy , 1990, Planta.

[23]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia , 1997 .

[24]  R. Ryel,et al.  Benefits associated with steep foliage orientation in two tussock grasses of the American Intermountain West. A look at water-use-efficiency and photoinhibition. , 1995 .

[25]  Koichi Takahashi,et al.  Optimal leaf display and biomass partitioning for efficient light capture in an understorey palm, Licuala arbuscula , 2001 .

[26]  M. Cannell,et al.  Support costs of different branch designs: effects of position, number, angle and deflection of laterals. , 1988, Tree physiology.

[27]  H. S. Horn The adaptive geometry of trees , 1971 .

[28]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Virtual plants: new perspectives for ecologists, pathologists and agricultural scientists , 1996 .

[29]  P. Gardingen,et al.  Allometric analysis of Sitka spruce branches: mechanical versus hydraulic design principles , 1995, Trees.

[30]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Photoinhibition and drought in Mediterranean woody saplings: scaling effects and interactions in sun and shade phenotypes. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  B. Medlyn,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) , 2002 .

[32]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  SEEDLING CROWN ORIENTATION AND INTERCEPTION OF DIFFUSE RADIATION IN TROPICAL FOREST GAPS , 1995 .