DEM-CFD simulations of fixed bed reactors with small tube to particle diameter ratios

Abstract A new meshing method for fixed beds consisting of monodisperse spherical particles is presented. The particles are flattened near the particle–particle and particle–wall contact points, respectively, to avoid bad cell qualities. Compared to known methods from literature the modifications are so small that a subsequent correction of these modifications is not necessary. CFD simulations are performed for tube to particle diameter ratios of 3 ≤  D / d  ≤ 10 in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regime and are compared with results from literature concerning porosity and pressure drop. The flow pattern within the bed is also investigated. The random fixed bed is generated with a DEM-code and the fluid domain is meshed with the commercial CFD code STAR-CCM+. The focus of this work is to verify, that physically correct results as well as meshes with a low number of cells and therewith short calculation time can be obtained with this new meshing method.

[1]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[2]  Anthony G. Dixon,et al.  Correlations for wall and particle shape effects on fixed bed bulk voidage , 1988 .

[3]  J. Cermák,et al.  Statistical analysis of local gas velocities at the exit from a packed bed , 1982 .

[4]  O. Kalthoff,et al.  Ignition/extinction phenomena in a wall cooled fixed bed reactor , 1980 .

[5]  D. Vortmeyer,et al.  Measured and modeled superficial flow profiles in packed beds with liquid flow , 1998 .

[6]  Wolfgang Reichelt,et al.  Zur Berechnung des Druckverlustes einphasig durchströmter Kugel- und Zylinderschüttungen , 1972 .

[7]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  A reevaluation of fluid flow, heat transfer and chemical reaction in catalyst filled tubes , 1992 .

[8]  K. Schnitzlein,et al.  The influence of confining walls on the pressure drop in packed beds , 2001 .

[9]  Hua Bai,et al.  A Coupled DEM and CFD Simulation of Flow Field and Pressure Drop in Fixed Bed Reactor with Randomly Packed Catalyst Particles , 2009 .

[10]  Arno de Klerk,et al.  Voidage variation in packed beds at small column to particle diameter ratio , 2003 .

[11]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  Fluid flow through catalyst filled tubes , 1997 .

[12]  P. Carman.  Fluid flow through granular beds , 1997 .

[13]  D. Vortmeyer,et al.  On the validity limits of packed bed reactor continuum models with respect to tube to particle diameter ratio , 1984 .

[14]  Eduard Egusquiza,et al.  CFD Flow and Heat Transfer in Nonregular Packings for Fixed Bed Equipment Design , 2004 .

[15]  Eugeny Y. Kenig,et al.  CFD-based analysis of the wall effect on the pressure drop in packed beds with moderate tube/particle diameter ratios in the laminar flow regime , 2009 .