Identification of crucial residues for the antibacterial activity of the proline-rich peptide, pyrrhocoricin.

Members of the proline-rich antibacterial peptide family, pyrrhocoricin, apidaecin and drosocin appear to kill responsive bacterial species by binding to the multihelical lid region of the bacterial DnaK protein. Pyrrhocoricin, the most potent among these peptides, is nontoxic to healthy mice, and can protect these animals from bacterial challenge. A structure-antibacterial activity study of pyrrhocoricin against Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens identified the N-terminal half, residues 2-10, the region responsible for inhibition of the ATPase activity, as the fragment that contains the active segment. While fluorescein-labeled versions of the native peptides entered E. coli cells, deletion of the C-terminal half of pyrrhocoricin significantly reduced the peptide's ability to enter bacterial or mammalian cells. These findings highlighted pyrrhocoricin's suitability for combating intracellular pathogens and raised the possibility that the proline-rich antibacterial peptides can deliver drug leads into mammalian cells. By observing strong relationships between the binding to a synthetic fragment of the target protein and antibacterial activities of pyrrhocoricin analogs modified at strategic positions, we further verified that DnaK was the bacterial target macromolecule. Inaddition, the antimicrobial activity spectrum of native pyrrhocoricin against 11 bacterial and fungal strains and the binding of labeled pyrrhocoricin to synthetic DnaK D-E helix fragments of the appropriate species could be correlated. Mutational analysis on a synthetic E. coli DnaK fragment identified a possible binding surface for pyrrhocoricin.

[1]  S. Lovas,et al.  Interaction between heat shock proteins and antimicrobial peptides. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[2]  L. Otvos,et al.  Development of novel antibacterial peptides that kill resistant isolates , 2002, Peptides.

[3]  C. B. Park,et al.  Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  M. Zasloff,et al.  Mechanism of synergism between antimicrobial peptides magainin 2 and PGLa. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[5]  D. Craik,et al.  Insect peptides with improved protease‐resistance protect mice against bacterial infection , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  S. Lovas,et al.  The antibacterial peptide pyrrhocoricin inhibits the ATPase actions of DnaK and prevents chaperone-assisted protein folding. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[7]  P. Christen,et al.  Detection of a very rapid first phase in complex formation of DnaK and peptide substrate , 2002, FEBS letters.

[8]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose‐bound peptide libraries , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[9]  Jiang Hong,et al.  A Repertoire of Novel Antibacterial Diastereomeric Peptides with Selective Cytolytic Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  C. B. Park,et al.  Structure-activity analysis of buforin II, a histone H2A-derived antimicrobial peptide: the proline hinge is responsible for the cell-penetrating ability of buforin II. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  T. Ganz,et al.  Interaction of human defensins with Escherichia coli. Mechanism of bactericidal activity. , 1989, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  L. Otvos,et al.  Intracellular targets of antibacterial peptides. , 2002, Current drug targets.

[13]  R. Hancock,et al.  The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences. , 2000, Trends in microbiology.

[14]  Craig M. Ogata,et al.  Structural Analysis of Substrate Binding by the Molecular Chaperone DnaK , 1996, Science.

[15]  S. Futaki,et al.  Arginine-rich Peptides , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  H. Mantsch,et al.  Aspartate-bond isomerization affects the major conformations of synthetic peptides. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[17]  G. Fields,et al.  Solid phase peptide synthesis utilizing 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[18]  D. Craik,et al.  Phosphorylation of the C-terminal sites of human p53 reduces non-sequence-specific DNA binding as modeled with synthetic peptides. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[19]  L. Otvos,et al.  Enlarged scale chemical synthesis and range of activity of drosocin, an O-glycosylated antibacterial peptide of Drosophila. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[20]  E. Blout,et al.  Conformations of (X-L-Pro-Y)2 cyclic hexapeptides. Preferred beta-turn conformers and implications for beta turns in proteins. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[21]  L. Otvos,et al.  Antibacterial peptides isolated from insects. , 2000, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[22]  V. Thulasiraman,et al.  Differential inhibition of Hsc70 activities by two Hsc70-binding peptides. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[23]  T. Kitahara,et al.  Antibiotic diffusion pathways in the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1997, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC.

[24]  Fluorescence polarization analysis of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Molecular endocrinology.

[25]  G. Fasman,et al.  The evaluation of type I and type II beta-turn mixtures. Circular dichroism, NMR and molecular dynamics studies. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[26]  G. H. Gudmundsson,et al.  Neutrophil antibacterial peptides, multifunctional effector molecules in the mammalian immune system. , 1999, Journal of immunological methods.

[27]  R. Hancock,et al.  Antibacterial Action of Structurally Diverse Cationic Peptides on Gram-Positive Bacteria , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[28]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Stabilization of the ribonuclease S‐peptide α‐helix by trifluoroethanol , 1986 .

[29]  L. Bagella,et al.  Biological Characterization of Two Novel Cathelicidin-derived Peptides and Identification of Structural Requirements for Their Antimicrobial and Cell Lytic Activities* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  P. Tempst,et al.  Lethal Effects of Apidaecin on Escherichia coliInvolve Sequential Molecular Interactions with Diverse Targets* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  K. Matsuzaki,et al.  Magainins as paradigm for the mode of action of pore forming polypeptides. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  E Maier,et al.  Mechanism of interaction of different classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides with planar bilayers and with the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[33]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  R. B. Merrifield,et al.  Channel-forming properties of cecropins and related model compounds incorporated into planar lipid membranes. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Jr L. Otvos,et al.  The short proline-rich antibacterial peptide family , 2002, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS.

[36]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Range of activity and metabolic stability of synthetic antibacterial glycopeptides from insects. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[37]  R. B. Merrifield,et al.  Synthesis and antibacterial action of cecropin and proline-arginine-rich peptides from pig intestine. , 2009, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[38]  Y. Shai Molecular recognition between membrane-spanning polypeptides. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  R. Gallo,et al.  Antimicrobial peptides: an emerging concept in cutaneous biology. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.