Factors governing the consumption of explicit knowledge

Knowledge management as a field continues to receive resounding interest from scholars. While we have made progress in many areas of knowledge management, we are yet to understand what factors contribute to employee usage of knowledge artifacts. A field study of 175 employees in a software engineering organization was conducted to understand factors that govern consumption of explicit knowledge. We assert that the decision to consume knowledge can be framed as a problem of risk evaluation. Specifically, there are two sources of risk a consumer must evaluate prior to knowledge consumption—risk from the knowledge producer and risk from the knowledge product. We find support for the factors of perceived complexity, perceived relative advantage , and perceived risk as they relate to intentions to consuming knowledge.

[1]  L. Cronbach Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[2]  W. H. Rodgers Consumer behavior as risk taking; a new model and new hypotheses. , 1969 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  T. Davenport,et al.  The Mysterious Art and Science of Knowledge-Worker Performance , 2002 .

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  D. F. Blankertz,et al.  Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior , 1969 .

[7]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[8]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  P. Nelson Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[11]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[12]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[13]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Reusing intellectual assets , 2003 .

[15]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[16]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[17]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Constructing internal knowledge markets: considerations from mini cases , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[18]  P. R. Warshaw A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[19]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  "Need to Know" - Organizational Knowledge and Management Perspective , 2004, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[22]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads , 1989 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[24]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  M. Darby,et al.  Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[26]  R. Cross,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. , 2002 .

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[28]  O. Arshad,et al.  Measuring software reuse , 2002, IEEE Students Conference, ISCON '02. Proceedings..

[29]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[30]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[31]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[32]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Organizational Learning during Advanced System Development: Opportunities and Obstacles , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[34]  Dennis Child,et al.  The essentials of factor analysis , 1970 .

[35]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[36]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[37]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering , 2003, CACM.

[38]  R. Grant TOWARD A KNOWLEDGE-ASED THEORY OF THE FIRM , 1996 .

[39]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[41]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[42]  L. Festinger A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 1957 .

[43]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Research Methods for Organizational Studies , 1998 .

[44]  M. S. Cunningham The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk , 1967 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .