Computational model combined with in vitro experiments to analyse mechanotransduction during mesenchymal stem cell adhesion.

The shape that stem cells reach at the end of adhesion process influences their differentiation. Rearrangement of cytoskeleton and modification of intracellular tension may activate mechanotransduction pathways controlling cell commitment. In the present study, the mechanical signals involved in cell adhesion were computed in in vitro stem cells of different shapes using a single cell model, the so-called Cytoskeleton Divided Medium (CDM) model. In the CDM model, the filamentous cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton networks were represented as a mechanical system of multiple tensile and compressive interactions between the nodes of a divided medium. The results showed that intracellular tonus, focal adhesion forces as well as nuclear deformation increased with cell spreading. The cell model was also implemented to simulate the adhesion process of a cell that spreads on protein-coated substrate by emitting filopodia and creating new distant focal adhesion points. As a result, the cell model predicted cytoskeleton reorganisation and reinforcement during cell spreading. The present model quantitatively computed the evolution of certain elements of mechanotransduction and may be a powerful tool for understanding cell mechanobiology and designing biomaterials with specific surface properties to control cell adhesion and differentiation.

[1]  Matthew J. Dalby,et al.  The role of microtopography in cellular mechanotransduction. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[2]  Pierre Weiss,et al.  Behaviour of mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts and osteoblasts on smooth surfaces. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[4]  Pierre Layrolle,et al.  Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants. , 2010, Nanomedicine.

[5]  A. Gefen,et al.  Confocal microscopy-based three-dimensional cell-specific modeling for large deformation analyses in cellular mechanics. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Matthew J. Dalby,et al.  Nanotopographical Control of Stem Cell Differentiation , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering.

[8]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[9]  J. Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear Shape, Mechanics, and Mechanotransduction , 2008, Circulation research.

[10]  M. Jean,et al.  Divided medium-based model for analyzing the dynamic reorganization of the cytoskeleton during cell deformation , 2007, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[11]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[12]  T. Webster,et al.  Decreased Fibroblast and Increased Osteoblast Functions on Ionic Plasma Deposited Nanostructured Ti Coatings , 2007, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[13]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[15]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[16]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[17]  Ning Wang,et al.  Cell spreading controls balance of prestress by microtubules and extracellular matrix. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[18]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[19]  D. Ingber,et al.  A Computational Tensegrity Model Predicts Dynamic Rheological Behaviors in Living Cells , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Christian Riekel,et al.  The mechanical properties of hydrated intermediate filaments: insights from hagfish slime threads. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Dietmar J. Manstein,et al.  Nanometer targeting of microtubules to focal adhesions , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Cell spreading controls endoplasmic and nuclear calcium: A physical gene regulation pathway from the cell surface to the nucleus , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Arnoud Sonnenberg,et al.  Function and interactions of integrins , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[26]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  J. Murphy-Ullrich The de-adhesive activity of matricellular proteins: is intermediate cell adhesion an adaptive state? , 2001, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  D Stamenović,et al.  Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[29]  Michel Saint Jean,et al.  The non-smooth contact dynamics method , 1999 .

[30]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Microtubule disruption induces the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured cells: possible involvement of the rho signal cascade. , 1996, Cell structure and function.

[31]  G. Forgacs On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: an approach based on percolation. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[32]  Nandan L Nerurkar,et al.  Mechano-topographic modulation of stem cell nuclear shape on nanofibrous scaffolds. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  Patrik Schmuki,et al.  Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix , 2009, Cell and Tissue Research.

[34]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  P Montcourrier,et al.  Mechanical model of cytoskeleton structuration during cell adhesion and spreading. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Analysis and Simulation of Contact Problems , 2006 .

[38]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Molecular interactions in cell adhesion complexes. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[39]  H Tashiro,et al.  Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[40]  R. Goldman,et al.  Relationship between intermediate filaments and microfilaments in cultured fibroblasts: evidence for common foci during cell spreading. , 1986, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.