Does the spatial arrangement of disturbance within forested watersheds affect loadings of nitrogen to stream waters? A test using Landsat and synoptic stream water data

Abstract Remotely sensed maps of forest disturbance provide a powerful tool for predicting spatial and temporal variability in the loading of nitrogen to receiving waters, key data needed for effective watershed management of nutrient pollution. We hypothesize that the spatial arrangement of disturbances within small-forested watersheds can affect N loadings. To test this, we developed schemes for spatially weighting maps of yearly disturbance produced through change analysis of the Landsat Tasseled Cap Disturbance Index (DI), and evaluated the ability of each scheme to predict N concentrations, and subsequently estimated N loads, from forty low-order streams within the Savage River drainage of western Maryland, USA during the 2006–2010 water years, a period encompassing extensive defoliations by gypsy moths ( Lymantria dispar). We generated a base scheme of unweighted, watershed averaged change in DI (ΔDI), and five other schemes that weighted ΔDI by either a pixel's flow accumulation value, the distance to the watershed outlet, or proximity to the stream. Over the five years, the flow accumulation scheme tended to perform better than other weighting schemes, and even explained slightly more variability than the base scheme during years of moderate N loads ( R 2  = 0.15 vs. 0.03 in 2007 and R 2  = 0.30 vs. 0.18 in 2010). However, this best spatial weighting scheme explained comparable or less variability during the two post-defoliation years with larger N loads ( R 2  = 0.43 vs. 0.44 in 2008 and R 2  = 0.31 vs. 0.48 in 2009). Thus, for the purposes of utilizing remote sensing information within watershed management of nutrient pollution, these results suggest that coarse-scale, high temporal frequency data such as MODIS could be well suited for characterizing forest disturbance and predicting the resultant episodic N loads.

[1]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Nitrate Losses from Disturbed Ecosystems , 1979, Science.

[3]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Modeling denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at regional scales. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options , 2003 .

[5]  E. Cowling,et al.  The Nitrogen Cascade , 2003 .

[6]  W. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen Saturation in Temperate Forest Ecosystems Hypotheses revisited , 2000 .

[7]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  A general Landsat model to predict canopy defoliation in broadleaf deciduous forests , 2012 .

[8]  D. Weller,et al.  Effects of riparian buffers on nitrate concentrations in watershed discharges: new models and management implications. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[10]  H. Jeong,et al.  Increasing N Abundance in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean Due to Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition , 2011, Science.

[11]  D. Correll,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest , 1984 .

[12]  P. Townsend,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF GYPSY MOTH DEFOLIATION TO ASSESS VARIATIONS IN STREAM NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS , 2004 .

[13]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[14]  Keith N. Eshleman,et al.  Maintenance of ecosystem nitrogen limitation by ephemeral forest disturbance: An assessment using MODIS, Hyperion, and Landsat ETM+ , 2007 .

[15]  K. Weathers,et al.  Forest Ecosystem Responses to Exotic Pests and Pathogens in Eastern North America , 2006 .

[16]  Keith N. Eshleman,et al.  Temporal patterns of nitrogen leakage from mid‐Appalachian forested watersheds: Role of insect defoliation , 1998 .

[17]  A. Herlihy,et al.  Regionalization of disturbance‐induced nitrogen leakage from mid‐Appalachian forests using a linear systems model , 2001 .

[18]  Keith N. Eshleman,et al.  Relationship of a Landsat cumulative disturbance index to canopy nitrogen and forest structure , 2012 .

[19]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Estimating the effect of gypsy moth defoliation using MODIS , 2008 .

[20]  G. Lovett,et al.  Insect Defoliation and Nitrogen Cycling in Forests , 2002 .

[21]  Keith N. Eshleman,et al.  Validation of a Remote Sensing Based Index of Forest Disturbance Using Streamwater Nitrogen Data , 2009 .

[22]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Linking the hydrologic and biogeochemical controls of nitrogen transport in near-stream zones of temperate-forested catchments: a review , 1997 .

[23]  G. Likens,et al.  Nitrogen Dynamics in Ice Storm-Damaged Forest Ecosystems: Implications for Nitrogen Limitation Theory , 2003, Ecosystems.

[24]  K. Weathers,et al.  Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter? , 2004 .

[25]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen Saturation in Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 1998 .

[26]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[27]  W. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection , 2005 .

[28]  Jane R. Foster,et al.  Linking Hyperspectral Imagery and Forest Inventories for Forest Assessment in the Central Appalachians , 2004 .

[29]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem , 1977, Springer US.