Augmented Reality Image Guidance in Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy

This paper presents our work aimed at providing augmented reality (AR) guidance of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALP) using the da Vinci system. There is a good clinical case for guidance due to the significant rate of complications and steep learning curve for this procedure. Patients who were due to undergo robotic prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer underwent preoperative 3T MRI scans of the pelvis. These were segmented and reconstructed to form 3D images of pelvic anatomy. The reconstructed image was successfully overlaid onto screenshots of the recorded surgery post-procedure. Surgeons who perform minimally-invasive prostatectomy took part in a user-needs analysis to determine the potential benefits of an image guidance system after viewing the overlaid images. All surgeons stated that the development would be useful at key stages of the surgery and could help to improve the learning curve of the procedure and improve functional and oncological outcomes. Establishing the clinical need in this way is a vital early step in development of an AR guidance system. We have also identified relevant anatomy from preoperative MRI. Further work will be aimed at automated registration to account for tissue deformation during the procedure, using a combination of transrectal ultrasound and stereoendoscopic video.

[1]  Scott Van Appledorn,et al.  Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: setup and procedural techniques after 150 cases. , 2006, Urology.

[2]  Dogu Teber,et al.  AUGMENTED REALITY A NEW TOOL TO IMPROVE SURGICAL ACCURACY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY , 2008 .

[3]  Philipp Dahm,et al.  Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. , 2010, European urology.

[4]  Hugh H. Young The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate , 2002 .

[5]  Ali Serdar Gözen,et al.  Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. , 2009, European urology.

[6]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.

[7]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a problem not only in the robotic literature. , 2010, European urology.

[8]  Anthony J. Strong,et al.  Principles and Practice of Image-guided Neurosurgery , 2006 .

[9]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. , 2004, JAMA.

[10]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[11]  S. Faraone,et al.  Stimulants and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder—Reply , 2004 .

[12]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Image-guided surgery in minimally invasive urology , 2010, Current opinion in urology.

[13]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Ralph V Clayman,et al.  Robotic revelation: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a nonlaparoscopic surgeon. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate cancer imaging , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[16]  Juni Palmgren,et al.  A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Higuchi,et al.  Image overlay navigation by markerless surface registration in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery , 2010, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[18]  Hugh H. Young,et al.  The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases , 2002 .