From (and To) a New Generation of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysts: An Introduction to the Field and a Personal View on its Future

The field of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is now mature, with several welldeveloped methodologies, a growing number of real-world interventions and a strong society that joins together researchers and practitioners all over the world. We believe that a new generation of multi-criteria decision analysts is emerging – interested in doing research and/or employing MCDA methodologies into practice – and also hope that, somehow, we could engage even more people in forming this new generation. It is within this scene that the paper was conceptualised. It has a dual aim of i) introducing the field to “young” researchers and practitioners, which may be interested in further developing MCDA methodologies, applying them into practice, or combining them with other decision methods; and ii) reflecting on potential further developments of the field that may be pursued by this new generation. Key-words: multi-criteria evaluation, strategic decision-making, multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) “Have you ever had a difficult decision to make? (…) At one time or another, all of us have wished that a hard decision was easy to make. The sad fact is that hard decisions are just that – hard. As individuals we run into such difficult decisions frequently. Business executives and governmental policy makers struggle with hard problems all the time.” (Clemen and Reilly

[1]  O. Larichev Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques , 1992 .

[2]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[3]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[4]  Valerie Belton,et al.  A Framework for Group Decision Using a MCDA Model: Sharing, Aggregating or Comparing Individual Information? , 1997 .

[5]  Paul N. Finlay On evaluating the performance of GSS: Furthering the debate , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  B. Roy Meaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision making , 1987 .

[7]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[8]  Euro Beinat,et al.  Value Functions for Environmental Management , 2014 .

[9]  M. Bazerman Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[10]  Marcus Vinicius Andrade de Lima,et al.  Decision aiding: methodologies for problem structuring and multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives , 2001 .

[11]  R. M. Oliver,et al.  Influence diagrams, belief nets and decision analysis , 1992 .

[12]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[13]  Simon French,et al.  Problem formulation for multi-criteria decision analysis: Report of a workshop , 1998 .

[14]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis: Some thoughts based on the tutorial and discussion sessions of the ESIGMA meetings , 1997 .

[15]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[16]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[17]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation Using COPE and V·I·S·A , 1997 .

[18]  Leonardo Ensslin,et al.  Decision Support Systems in action: Integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-aid , 1993 .

[21]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[22]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[23]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design , 1998 .

[24]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs , 2002, Oper. Res..

[25]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2000 .

[26]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[27]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[28]  E. El-Durzi Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming , 1991 .

[29]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[30]  H. Pastijn Handbook of critical issues in goal programming: Carlos Romero Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1990, xi + 124 pages, £25.00, ISBN 008 0406610 , 1992 .

[31]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[32]  P. Checkland,et al.  Action Research: Its Nature and Validity , 1998 .

[33]  Hans Vrolijk,et al.  Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  L. Ensslin,et al.  Constructing and Implementing a DSS to Help Evaluate Perceived Risk of Accounts Receivable , 2000 .

[35]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Supporting factoring transactions in Brazil using reasoning maps: a language-based DSS for evaluating accounts receivable , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  Multi‐criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review , 2002 .

[37]  Zakkula Govindarajulu,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgement. , 1993 .

[38]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[39]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[40]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  The MACBETH Approach: Basic Ideas, Software, and an Application , 1999 .

[41]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Advances in decision analysis , 1999 .

[42]  T. Stewart A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[43]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Decision science or decision-aid science? , 1993 .