Comment on “Alemtuzumab improves cognitive processing speed in active multiple sclerosis – a longitudinal observational study”

An interesting article was recently read about the effect of alemtuzumab on cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) 1 . This brings up the question whether other highly efficacious treatments can impact CI? If the answer is positive, is it permissible to select an escalation approach? MS is a debilitating disease of central nervous system (CNS), which is common among young adults with notice-able economic consequences on the government 2 . Due to wide-spread distribution of lesions, MS manifests a broad range of the symptoms. CI is one of the most critical symptoms, with prevalence rate ranging from 43 to 70% 3 , embracing all types of clinical courses and disease stages 4 . The evidence suggests that neuropsychological scores are better in relapsing-remitting (RR) patients compared to secondary-progressive (SP) and pri-mary-progressive (PP) cases 5 . Cognitive impairment is more severe in SP patients than in PP patients 6 . Unfortunately, the effect of disease-modifying therapy (DMTs) on cognition is not well known. There is less evidence that DMTs are beneficial to improve the cognition 1 . However, there is still no clear answer to this question: Do high potent DMTs significantly impact CI by slowing and stabilizing the course compared with low potent drugs? Clarification of this issue seems to make a sig-nificant change in treating MS patients. Studies showed a link between CI and brain atrophy. Brain atrophy can be seen in the early stages of MS, which is asso-ciated with a decrease in brain volume and function. It was found that the higher the severity of cognition impairment in the patients, the higher the severity of brain atrophy 7,8 . Previously,

[1]  H. Hartung,et al.  Disease-modifying treatments and cognition in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis , 2020, Neurology.

[2]  X. Montalban,et al.  Treatment Optimization in Multiple Sclerosis: Canadian MS Working Group Recommendations , 2020, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[3]  S. Khoury,et al.  "No evidence of disease activity": Is it an aspirational therapeutic goal in multiple sclerosis? , 2020, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[4]  L. Pandit No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) in Multiple Sclerosis - Shifting the Goal Posts , 2019, Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.

[5]  V. Tomassini,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Escalation vs Early Intensive Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, JAMA neurology.

[6]  G. Edan,et al.  Induction or escalation therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis? , 2018, Revue neurologique.

[7]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  Cognition in multiple sclerosis , 2018, Neurology.

[8]  H. Wiendl,et al.  Alemtuzumab Improves Cognitive Processing Speed in Active Multiple Sclerosis—A Longitudinal Observational Study , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[9]  G. Fenu,et al.  Induction and escalation therapies in multiple sclerosis. , 2015, Anti-inflammatory & anti-allergy agents in medicinal chemistry.

[10]  D. R. Allington,et al.  New approaches in the management of multiple sclerosis , 2010, Drug design, development and therapy.

[11]  R. Benedict,et al.  Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS) , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  C. Polman,et al.  Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS , 2004, Neurology.

[13]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Correlating Brain Atrophy With Cognitive Dysfunction, Mood Disturbances, and Personality Disorder in Multiple Sclerosis , 2004, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[14]  A. Soddu,et al.  Longitudinal study of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: neuropsychological, neuroradiological, and neurophysiological findings , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  J. Foong,et al.  A comparison of neuropsychological deficits in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[16]  M. Bonnan,et al.  No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in MS should include CSF biology - Towards a 'Disease-Free Status Score'. , 2017, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.