Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations

Abstract We examined resource limitations on growth and carbon allocation in a fast-growing, clonal plantation of Eucalyptus grandis  ×  urophylla in Brazil by characterizing responses to annual rainfall, and response to irrigation and fertililization for 2 years. Productivity measures included gross primary production (GPP), total belowground carbon allocation (TBCA), bole growth, and net ecosystem production (NEP). Replicate plots within a single plantation were established at the midpoint of the rotation (end of year 3), with treatments of no additional fertilization or irrigation, heavy fertilization (to remove any nutrient limitation), irrigation (to remove any water limitation), and irrigation plus fertilization. Rainfall was unusually high in the first year (1769 mm) of the experiment, and control plots had high rates of GPP (6.64 kg C m −2  year −1 ), TBCA (2.14 kg C m −2  year −1 ), and bole growth (1.81 kg C m −2  year −1 ). Irrigation increased each of these rates by 15–17%. The second year of the experiment had average rainfall (1210 mm), and lower rainfall decreased production in control plots by 46% (GPP), 52% (TBCA), and 40% (bole growth). Fertilization treatments had neglible effects. The response to irrigation was much greater in the drier year, with irrigated plots exceeding the production in control plots by 83% (GPP), 239% (TBCA), and 24% (bole growth). Even though the rate of irrigation ensured no water limitation to tree growth, the high rainfall year showed higher production in irrigated plots for both GPP (38% greater than in drier year) and bole growth (23% greater). Varying humidity and supplies of water led to a range in NEP of 0.8–2.7 kg C m −2  year −1 . This difference between control and irrigated treatments, combined with differences between drier and wetter years, indicated a strong response of these Eucalyptus trees to both water supply and atmospheric humidity during the dry season. The efficiency of converting light energy into fixed carbon ranged from a low of 0.027 mol C to a high of 0.060 mol C per mol of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), and the efficiency of bolewood production ranged from 0.78 to 1.98 g wood per MJ of APAR. Irrigation increased the efficiency of wood production per unit of water used from 2.55 kg wood m −3 in the rainfed plot to 3.51 kg m −3 in irrigated plots. Detailed information on the response of C budgets to environmental conditions and resource supplies will be necessary for accurate predictions of plantation yields across years and landscapes.

[1]  C. Giardina,et al.  Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest , 2003 .

[2]  Nutrition of Eucalypts , 1996 .

[3]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests , 2004 .

[4]  E. Pook.  Canopy Dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. III Effects of Drought , 1985 .

[5]  A. G. Brown,et al.  Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests , 1997 .

[6]  W. Bond,et al.  Variation in water use efficiency and δ13C levels in Eucalyptus grandis clones , 1993 .

[7]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[8]  I. Prentice,et al.  A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production , 1996 .

[9]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Use of a simple plantation productivity model to study the profitability of irrigated Eucalyptus globulus , 1999 .

[10]  D. Flinn,et al.  Nutrient accumulation in trees and soil following irrigation with municipal effluent in Australia. , 1990, Environmental pollution.

[11]  C. D. Whitesell,et al.  Early growth and nutrient status of Eucalyptus saligna as affected by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisation. , 1987 .

[12]  Auro C. Almeida,et al.  Parameterisation of 3-PG model for fast-growing Eucalyptus grandis plantations , 2004 .

[13]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Age-related Decline in Forest Ecosystem Growth: An Individual-Tree, Stand-Structure Hypothesis , 2002, Ecosystems.

[14]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Net primary production and nutrient cycling in replicated stands of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia facaltaria , 1998 .

[15]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[16]  V. Dantec,et al.  Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: comparison of two closed dynamic systems , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[17]  I. Hunter.  Above ground biomass and nutrient uptake of three tree species (Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus grandis and Dalbergia sissoo) as affected by irrigation and fertiliser, at 3 years of age, in southern India , 2001 .

[18]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  A simple method for estimating gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[19]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Simple model to estimate field-measured soil water limits , 1999 .

[20]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest productivity in Australia and New Zealand using a physiologically-based model driven with averaged monthly weather data and satellite-derived estimates of canopy photosynthetic capacity , 1998 .

[21]  M. I C H A E,et al.  Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems , 2007 .

[22]  J. Laclau,et al.  Dynamics of biomass and nutrient accumulation in a clonal plantation of Eucalyptus in Congo , 2000 .

[23]  J. J. Landsberg,et al.  Biomass production by fast-growing trees. , 1989 .

[24]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Tree-girdling to separate root and heterotrophic respiration in two Eucalyptus stands in Brazil , 2006, Oecologia.

[25]  I. Calder,et al.  Growth and water use of forest plantations , 1992 .

[26]  Timothy A. Martin,et al.  Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands , 2000 .

[27]  M. Mielke,et al.  Stomatal control of transpiration in the canopy of a clonal Eucalyptus grandis plantation , 1999, Trees.

[28]  M. Cannell.  Growing trees to sequester carbon in the UK: answers to some common questions , 1999 .

[29]  B. Medlyn.  Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[30]  P. Vitousek.  Can planted forests counteract increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1991 .

[31]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Productivity of temperate de-ciduous and evergreen forests , 1983 .

[32]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Belowground carbon cycling in a humid tropical forest decreases with fertilization , 2004, Oecologia.

[33]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Testing the utility of the 3-PG model for growth of Eucalyptus grandis×urophylla with natural and manipulated supplies of water and nutrients , 2004 .

[34]  E. K. S. Nambiar,et al.  Soil and stand management for short-rotation plantations. , 1997 .

[35]  Jose Luiz Stape,et al.  Relationships between nursery practices and field performance for Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil , 2001, New Forests.

[36]  R. F. Novais,et al.  Productivity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis affected by rate and placement of two phosphorus fertilizers to a Brazilian Oxisol. , 2000 .

[37]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[38]  S. Rance,et al.  Response to nutrients in Eucalyptus grandis. 1. Biomass accumulation , 1993 .

[39]  M. Cannell.  Physiological basis of wood production: A review , 1989 .

[40]  J. Turner,et al.  Response of flooded gum (E. grandis) to intensive cultural treatments: biomass and nutrient content of eucalypt plantations and native forests , 1992 .

[41]  J. Hunt,et al.  Relationship between woody biomass and PAR conversion efficiency for estimating net primary production from NDVI , 1994 .

[42]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of primary production : an improved production efficiency modeling approach , 1999 .

[43]  Nicholas B. Comerford,et al.  Above-ground biomass, nutrient content, and nutrient use efficiency of eucalypt plantations growing in different sites in Brazil. , 2000 .

[44]  W. Bond,et al.  Growth and water use of Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus radiata plantations irrigated with effluent. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[45]  E. Pook.  Canopy dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. IV. Contrasting responses to two severe droughts. , 1986 .

[46]  C. Jourdan,et al.  Changes with age in the spatial distribution of roots of Eucalyptus clone in Congo: Impact on water and nutrient uptake , 2002 .

[47]  J. Pereira,et al.  Water stress limitations to tree productivity , 1989 .

[48]  Birger Solberg,et al.  Potential and Economic Efficiency of Carbon Sequestration in Forest Biomass Through Silvicultural Management , 1994 .

[49]  John D. Marshall,et al.  Eight-year responses of light interception, effective leaf area index, and stemwood production in fertilized stands of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca). , 2000 .

[50]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[51]  D. Binkley,et al.  CHANGES IN SOIL CARBON FOLLOWING AFFORESTATION IN HAWAII , 1998 .

[52]  Chris A. Maier,et al.  Soil CO 2 evolution and root respiration in 11 year-old Loblolly Pine ( Pinus taeda ) Plantations as Affected by Moisture and Nutrient Availability , 2000 .

[53]  C. Beadle,et al.  Growth and water use of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in irrigated and rainfed plantations , 1996 .

[54]  Ivan A. Janssens,et al.  Assessing forest soil CO(2) efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[55]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil , 2004 .

[56]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Total Belowground Carbon Allocation in a Fast-growing Eucalyptus Plantation Estimated Using a Carbon Balance Approach , 2002, Ecosystems.