Is parasite pressure a driver of chemical cue diversity in ants?

Parasites and pathogens are possibly key evolutionary forces driving recognition systems. However, empirical evidence remains sparse. The ubiquitous pioneering ant Formica fusca is exploited by numerous socially parasitic ant species. We compared the chemical cue diversity, egg and nest mate recognition abilities in two Finnish and two UK populations where parasite pressure is high or absent, respectively. Finnish populations had excellent egg and nest mate discrimination abilities, which were lost in the UK populations. The loss of discrimination behaviour correlates with a loss in key recognition compounds (C25-dimethylalkanes). This was not owing to genetic drift or different ecotypes since neutral gene diversity was the same in both countries. Furthermore, it is known that the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of non-host ant species remain stable between Finland and the UK. The most parsimonious explanation for the striking difference in the cue diversity (number of C25-dimethylalkanes isomers) between the UK and Finland populations is the large differences in parasite pressure experienced by F. fusca in the two countries. These results have strong parallels with bird (cuckoo) studies and support the hypothesis that parasites are driving recognition cue diversity.

[1]  B. Lavine,et al.  Changes in the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profile of the Slave-Maker Ant Queen, Polyergus breviceps Emery, After Killing a Formica Host Queen (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  P. Pamilo,et al.  Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the ant Formica exsecta , 2002 .

[3]  P. Punttila.  Succession, Forest Fragmentation, and the Distribution of Wood Ants , 1996 .

[4]  L. Sundström,et al.  Population genetics of the black ant Formica lemani (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2009 .

[5]  J M Cornuet,et al.  Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. , 1996, Genetics.

[6]  Stephen J. Martin,et al.  Evolution of species-specific cuticular hydrocarbon patterns in Formica ants , 2008 .

[7]  A. Gardner,et al.  Social Evolution: The Decline and Fall of Genetic Kin Recognition , 2007, Current Biology.

[8]  L. Sundström,et al.  Worker policing and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  E. Hasegawa,et al.  Characterization of microsatellite loci in red wood ants Formica (s. str.) spp. and the related genus Polyergus , 2004 .

[10]  S. Martin,et al.  Is the social parasite Vespa dybowskii using chemical transparency to get her eggs accepted? , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[11]  Behavioural interactions, kin and disease susceptibility in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[12]  R. Yamaoka,et al.  Ant Nestmate and Non-Nestmate Discrimination by a Chemosensory Sensillum , 2005, Science.

[13]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Prior experience with eggs laid by non-nestmate queens induces egg acceptance errors in ant workers , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  F. Ratnieks.  The Evolution of Genetic Odor-Cue Diversity in Social Hymenoptera , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[15]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Behavioural assays testing the appeasement allomone of Polyergus rufescens queens during host-colony usurpation , 2000 .

[16]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Two independent mechanisms of egg recognition in worker Formica fusca ants , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  C. Galizia,et al.  Ants recognize foes and not friends , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  S. Martin,et al.  A Review of Ant Cuticular Hydrocarbons , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  T. Akino,et al.  Repellent effect on host Formica workers of queen Dufour's gland secretion of the obligatory social parasite ant, Polyergus samurai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 2009 .

[20]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[21]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Queen fertility, egg marking and colony size in the ant Camponotus floridanus , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  J. Boomsma,et al.  A Mosaic of Chemical Coevolution in a Large Blue Butterfly , 2008, Science.

[23]  S. Martin,et al.  Colony-specific Hydrocarbons Identify Nest Mates in Two Species of Formica Ant , 2008, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[24]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing , 2002, Nature.

[25]  M. Ayasse,et al.  Do social parasitic bumblebees use chemical weapons? (Hymenoptera, Apidae) , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  N. Davies,et al.  Cuckoos and parasitic ants: Interspecific brood parasitism as an evolutionary arms race. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  B. Lavine,et al.  Do these eggs smell funny to you?: an experimental study of egg discrimination by hosts of the social parasite Polyergus breviceps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  R. Yamaoka,et al.  Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as nestmate recognition cues in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004 .

[29]  P. Neumann,et al.  Nestmate recognition and the genetic gestalt in the mound-building ant Formica polyctena , 1997, Insectes Sociaux.

[30]  A. MØller,et al.  A quantitative trait locus for recognition of foreign eggs in the host of a brood parasite , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[31]  D. Lahti.  Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  P. Schmid-Hempel.  Parasites in Social Insects , 1998 .

[33]  W. Bogdanowicz.  Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences , 2006 .

[34]  F. Rousset,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORIGIN AND MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC KIN RECOGNITION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  G. Sorci.  Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Host Specific Social Parasites (Psithyrus) Indicate Chemical Recognition System in Bumblebees , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[37]  J. H. Sudd,et al.  The distribution of wood‐ants (Formica lugubris Zetterstedt) in a northern English forest , 1977 .

[38]  S. Martin,et al.  Chemical basis of nest-mate discrimination in the ant Formica exsecta , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Insect hydrocarbons : biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology , 2010 .

[40]  M. Nei.  Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[41]  R. Savolainen.  Colony success of the submissive ant Formica fusca within territories of the dominant Formica polyctena , 1990 .

[42]  L. Sundström,et al.  Habitat age, breeding system and kinship in the ant Formica fusca , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[43]  F. R. A N C I,et al.  Role of hydrocarbons in egg recognition in the honeybee , 2004 .

[44]  F. Drijfhout,et al.  Egg marking in the facultatively queenless ant Gnamptogenys striatula: the source and mechanism. , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[45]  J. Heinze,et al.  Arms races between social parasites and their hosts: geographic patterns of manipulation and resistance , 2003 .

[46]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[47]  J. Jallon,et al.  A delta 9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for the cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Collingwood.,et al.  The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark , 1979 .

[49]  F. Drijfhout,et al.  Polygyny reduces rather than increases nestmate discrimination cue diversity in Formica exsecta ants , 2009, Insectes Sociaux.

[50]  R. Crozier.  GENETIC CLONAL RECOGNITION ABILITIES IN MARINE INVERTEBRATES MUST BE MAINTAINED BY SELECTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  A. Møller,et al.  Meadow pipit ( Anthus pratensis ) egg appearance in cuckoo ( Cuculus canorus ) sympatric and allopatric populations , 2003 .

[52]  H. Ochi,et al.  Alloparental care between catfishes in Lake Tanganyika , 2001 .

[53]  H. Donisthorpe.  British Ants: Their Life-History and Classification , 2008 .

[54]  M. Chapuisat.  Characterization of microsatellite loci in Formica lugubris B and their variability in other ant species , 1996, Molecular ecology.