Comparison of Piezoelectric and Optical Projection Imaging for Three-Dimensional In Vivo Photoacoustic Tomography

Ultrasound sensor arrays for photoacoustic tomography (PAT) are investigated that create line projections of the pressure generated in an object by pulsed light illumination. Projections over a range of viewing angles enable the reconstruction of a three-dimensional image. Two line-integrating arrays are compared in this study for the in vivo imaging of vasculature, a piezoelectric array, and a camera-based setup that captures snapshots of the acoustic field emanating from the sample. An array consisting of 64 line-shaped sensors made of piezoelectric polymer film, which was arranged on a half-cylindrical area, was used to acquire spatiotemporal data from a human finger. The optical setup used phase contrast to visualize the acoustic field generated in the leg of a mouse after a selected delay time. Time-domain back projection and frequency-domain back propagation were used for image reconstruction from the piezoelectric and optical data, respectively. The comparison yielded an about threefold higher resolution for the optical setup and an about 13-fold higher sensitivity of the piezoelectric array. Due to the high density of data in the camera images, the optical technique gave images without streak artifacts, which were visible in the piezo array images due to the discrete detector positions. Overall, both detection concepts are suited for almost real-time projection imaging and three-dimensional imaging with a data acquisition time of less than a minute without averaging, which was limited by the repetition rate of the laser.

[1]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Looking at sound: optoacoustics with all-optical ultrasound detection , 2018, Light: Science & Applications.

[2]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Deblurring algorithms accounting for the finite detector size in photoacoustic tomography , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Robert Nuster,et al.  High resolution three-dimensional photoacoutic tomography with CCD-camera based ultrasound detection , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[4]  Hope T. Beier,et al.  All-optical optoacoustic microscopy based on probe beam deflection technique , 2016, Photoacoustics.

[5]  M. Haltmeier,et al.  Exact and approximative imaging methods for photoacoustic tomography using an arbitrary detection surface. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Richard Su,et al.  Whole-body three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography system for small animals. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Functional optoacoustic neuro-tomography for scalable whole-brain monitoring of calcium indicators , 2016, Light: Science & Applications.

[8]  Minghua Xu,et al.  Analytic explanation of spatial resolution related to bandwidth and detector aperture size in thermoacoustic or photoacoustic reconstruction. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Matthew O'Donnell,et al.  Ultrasound detection using polymer microring optical resonator , 2004 .

[10]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Full field detection in photoacoustic tomography. , 2010, Optics express.

[11]  Lihong V Wang,et al.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography , 2005, SPIE BiOS.

[12]  Minghua Xu,et al.  Erratum: Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography [Phys. Rev. E 71, 016706 (2005)] , 2007 .

[13]  J. Laufer,et al.  In vivo high-resolution 3D photoacoustic imaging of superficial vascular anatomy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Thomas Berer,et al.  All-optical photoacoustic projection imaging. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[16]  H Schmidt-Kloiber,et al.  Optoacoustic tomography: time-gated measurement of pressure distributions and image reconstruction. , 2001, Applied optics.

[17]  Robert Nuster,et al.  Comparison of optical and piezoelectric integrating line detectors , 2009, BiOS.

[18]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Video rate optoacoustic tomography of mouse kidney perfusion. , 2010, Optics letters.

[19]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Reconstructions in limited-view thermoacoustic tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[20]  H. Weber,et al.  Temporal backward projection of optoacoustic pressure transients using fourier transform methods. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Robert Nuster,et al.  Piezoelectric line detector array for photoacoustic tomography , 2017, Photoacoustics.

[22]  Cheng Sun,et al.  Optical Detection of Ultrasound in Photoacoustic Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  G Paltauf,et al.  Weight factors for limited angle photoacoustic tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer as an acoustic line detector. , 2007, Applied optics.

[25]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Spatial resolution in photoacoustic tomography: effects of detector size and detector bandwidth , 2010 .

[26]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast , 2018, Nature Communications.

[27]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Experimental evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for limited view photoacoustic tomography with line detectors , 2007 .

[28]  Thomas Berer,et al.  Characterization of broadband fiber optic line detectors for photoacoustic tomography , 2012, Journal of biophotonics.

[29]  P. Beard,et al.  Characterization of a polymer film optical fiber hydrophone for use in the range 1 to 20 MHz: A comparison with PVDF needle and membrane hydrophones , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.