Increasing discrepancy between absolute and effective indexes of research output in a Brazilian academic department

We investigate possible effects from a strong encouragement for a large number of publications on the scientific production of a Brazilian cell biology department. An average increase in individual absolute production and a concomitant decrease in individual participation in each paper were detected by traditional bibliometric parameters, such as number of publications, citations, impact factors and h index, combined to their “effective” versions, in which co-authorship is taken into consideration. The observed situation, which might well represent a national trend, should be considered as a strong warning against current criteria of scientific evaluation heavily based on uncritical counting of publications.

[1]  Jacqueline Leta,et al.  Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case , 2002, Scientometrics.

[2]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[4]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The h Index in Science: A New Measure of Scholarly Contribution , 2006 .

[5]  Marcelo Hermes-Lima,et al.  The relevance and recognition of Latin American science. Introduction to the fourth issue of CBP-Latin America. , 2007, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[6]  D. Serwer.  Science in Brazil. , 1992, Science.

[7]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995) , 2006, Scientometrics.

[8]  Rogerio Meneghini,et al.  The key role of collaborative work in the growth of Brazilian science in the last ten years , 1996, Scientometrics.

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry , 2004, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Jennions,et al.  The h index and career assessment by numbers. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Marcelo Hermes-Lima,et al.  Whither Latin America? trends and challenges of science in Latin America , 2007, IUBMB life.

[13]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[14]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[15]  Andy R Weale,et al.  The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[16]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico , 1995, Scientometrics.

[17]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[19]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[20]  Luis Mauricio Bini,et al.  Brazilian articles in international journals on Limnology , 2006, Scientometrics.