Simultaneous Optimization of Decisions Using a Linear Utility Function

The purpose of this article is to simultaneously optimize decision rules for combinations of elementary decisions. With this approach, rules are found that make more efficient use of the data than could be achieved by optimizing these decisions separately. The framework for the approach is derived from Bayesian decision theory. To illustrate the approach, two elementary decisions (selection and mastery decisions) are combined into a simple decision network. A linear utility structure is assumed. Decision rules are derived both for quota-free and quota-restricted selection–mastery decisions in case of several subpopulations. An empirical example of instructional decision making in an individual study system concludes the article.

[1]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[2]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  The linear utility model for optimal selection , 1981 .

[3]  Torsten Husén,et al.  The international encyclopedia of education : research and studies , 1985 .

[4]  M. J. Subkoviak A Practitioner's Guide to Computation and Interpretation of Reliability Indices for Mastery Tests , 1988 .

[5]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  On de Encountered Using Decision Theory to Set Cutoff Scores , 1984 .

[6]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  Distributions Possessing a Monotone Likelihood Ratio , 1956 .

[7]  A. Gross,et al.  Defining a "fair" or "unbiased" selection model: A question of utilities. , 1975 .

[8]  Hendrik J. Vos,et al.  Designing Optimal Rules for Instructional Decision Making in CAI Systems , 1987 .

[9]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[10]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery scores , 1981 .

[11]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  Applications of decision theory to test-based decision making , 1987 .

[12]  N. Petersen,et al.  An Expected Utility Model for “Optimal” Selection , 1976 .

[13]  M. R. Novick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF SOME MODELS FOR CULTURE-FAIR SELECTION , 1976 .

[14]  M. J. Subkoviak Estimating Reliability from a Single Administration of a Mastery Test. , 1976 .

[15]  H. Huynh ON THE RELIABILITY OF DECISIONS IN DOMAIN‐REFERENCED TESTING , 1976 .

[16]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  A BAYESIAN DECISION-THEORETIC PROCEDURE FOR USE WITH CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS1 , 1975 .

[17]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  M. J. Subkoviak,et al.  A Note on Huynh's Normal Approximation Procedure for Estimating Criterion-Referenced Reliability. , 1980 .

[19]  E. Lehmann,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypothesis. , 1960 .

[20]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Decision models for use with criterion-referenced tests , 1980 .

[21]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF THEORY AND METHOD FOR CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS1,2 , 1973 .

[22]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[23]  H. Huynh Two simple classes of mastery scores based on the beta-binomial model , 1977 .

[24]  Hans J. Vos The Use of Decision Theory in the Minnesota Adaptive Instructional System. Research Report 88-6. , 1988 .

[25]  M. Degroot Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[26]  G. J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Empirical Specification of Utility Functions. , 1989 .

[27]  Gerald S. Rogers,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach , 1967 .

[28]  David Lindley,et al.  The Use of More Realistic Utility Functions in Educational Applications. , 1978 .

[29]  M. R. Novick,et al.  TOWARDS EQUALIZING EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY , 1976 .

[30]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  RELIABILITY OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTS: A DECISION‐THEORETIC FORMULATION , 1974 .

[31]  S. Gupta Probability Integrals of Multivariate Normal and Multivariate $t^1$ , 1963 .

[32]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  Coefficients for Tests from a Decision Theoretic Point of View , 1977 .

[33]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Theory and Practice for the use of Cut-Scores for Personnel Decisions , 1981 .

[34]  James M. Ortega,et al.  Iterative solution of nonlinear equations in several variables , 2014, Computer science and applied mathematics.

[35]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1973 .

[36]  W. D. Linden The Use of Test Scores for Classification Decisions with Threshold Utility , 1987 .

[37]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  Optimal Cutting Scores Using A Linear Loss Function , 1977 .

[38]  Bastiaan J. Vrijhof,et al.  Assessing and Studying Utility Functions in Psychometric Decision Theory , 1983 .