Application of Fractal and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Analysis in Evaluation of Brain Corpus Callosum and Cingulum Architecture

Abstract This aim of this study was to assess the discriminatory value of fractal and grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis methods in standard microscopy analysis of two histologically similar brain white mass regions that have different nerve fiber orientation. A total of 160 digital micrographs of thionine-stained rat brain white mass were acquired using a Pro-MicroScan DEM-200 instrument. Eighty micrographs from the anterior corpus callosum and eighty from the anterior cingulum areas of the brain were analyzed. The micrographs were evaluated using the National Institutes of Health ImageJ software and its plugins. For each micrograph, seven parameters were calculated: angular second moment, inverse difference moment, GLCM contrast, GLCM correlation, GLCM variance, fractal dimension, and lacunarity. Using the Receiver operating characteristic analysis, the highest discriminatory value was determined for inverse difference moment (IDM) (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve equaled 0.925, and for the criterion IDM≤0.610 the sensitivity and specificity were 82.5 and 87.5%, respectively). Most of the other parameters also showed good sensitivity and specificity. The results indicate that GLCM and fractal analysis methods, when applied together in brain histology analysis, are highly capable of discriminating white mass structures that have different axonal orientation.

[1]  R. Kalpana,et al.  Virus infection on brain white matter: statistical analysis of DT MRI scans , 2011, Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl..

[2]  Wlodzimierz Klonowski,et al.  Fractals in the Neurosciences, Part II , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[3]  Guang H. Yue,et al.  Quantifying degeneration of white matter in normal aging using fractal dimension , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[4]  Konradin Metze,et al.  Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis , 2013, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[5]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Cingulum Microstructure Predicts Cognitive Control in Older Age and Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetic model and 3-D morphology analysis. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  G. Hynd,et al.  The Role of the Corpus Callosum in Interhemispheric Transfer of Information: Excitation or Inhibition? , 2005, Neuropsychology Review.

[8]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Distinct subdivisions of the cingulum bundle revealed by diffusion MRI fibre tracking: Implications for neuropsychological investigations , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  G. Castellano,et al.  MR Imaging Texture Analysis of the Corpus Callosum and Thalamus in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  Fabio Grizzi,et al.  Fractals in the Neurosciences, Part I , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[11]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Complexity reduction of chromatin architecture in macula densa cells during mouse postnatal development , 2013, Nephrology.

[12]  J. Paunović,et al.  Aging Increases Nuclear Chromatin Entropy of Erythroid Precursor Cells in Mice Spleen Hematopoietic Tissue , 2012, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[13]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Nuclear entropy, angular second moment, variance and texture correlation of thymus cortical and medullar lymphocytes: grey level co-occurrence matrix analysis. , 2013, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[14]  Ying Pan,et al.  Towards MIB-1 and p53 detection in glioma magnetic resonance image: a novel computational image analysis method. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Lior Shamir,et al.  Quantitative measurement of aging using image texture entropy , 2009, Bioinform..

[16]  Konradin Metze,et al.  Fractal dimension of chromatin and cancer prognosis. , 2010, Epigenomics.

[17]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls - data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2011, Arthritis research & therapy.

[19]  A. Di Ieva Fractal analysis of microvascular networks in malignant brain tumors. , 2012, Clinical neuropathology.

[20]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Costantino Balestra,et al.  The Fractal approach as a tool to understand asymptomatic Brain hyperintense MRI Signals in Divers , 2004 .

[22]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Lacunarity Analysis: A Promising Method for the Automated Assessment of Melanocytic Naevi and Melanoma , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  André Victor Alvarenga,et al.  Complexity curve and grey level co-occurrence matrix in the texture evaluation of breast tumor on ultrasound images. , 2007, Medical physics.

[24]  Gabriele A. Losa,et al.  Nuclear patterns of human breast cancer cells during apoptosis: characterisation by fractal dimension and co-occurrence matrix statistics , 2005, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Changes in fractal dimension and lacunarity as early markers of UV-induced apoptosis. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Andrea Berghold,et al.  Primary Unit for Statistical Analysis in Morphometry: Patient or Cell? , 1999, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[27]  Konradin Metze,et al.  Fractal dimension of chromatin is an independent prognostic factor for survival in melanoma , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[28]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Texture Analysis of Germinal Center Light Zone Lymphocyte Nuclei: Physiology Viewpoint with Focus on Apoptosis , 2012, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[29]  Dušan Ristanović,et al.  Fractality of dendritic arborization of spinal cord neurons , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Fractal dimension and white matter changes in multiple sclerosis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Neucimar J. Leite,et al.  The Fractal Dimension of Nuclear Chromatin as a Prognostic Factor in Acute Precursor B Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2006, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[33]  S. Pantic,et al.  Germinal Center Texture Entropy as Possible Indicator of Humoral Immune Response: Immunophysiology Viewpoint , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[34]  Dušan Ristanović,et al.  Application of fractal analysis to neuronal dendritic arborisation patterns of the monkey dentate nucleus , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  R. Modzelewski,et al.  Comparison of heterogeneity quantification algorithms for brain SPECT perfusion images , 2012, EJNMMI Research.

[36]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Texture analysis of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  Daniel J. Gould,et al.  Multifractal and Lacunarity Analysis of Microvascular Morphology and Remodeling , 2011, Microcirculation.