Searching behaviour of foraging waders: does feeding success influence their walking?

Predators that feed on clustered prey tend to have an ‘area-restricted search’ (ARS), characterized by a combination of a slow and tortuous movement in prey-rich areas, and a fast and straight movement in poorer areas. Waders that forage in intertidal areas usually prey upon buried macroinvertebrates, whose distribution is often clustered. However, wader species differ in the strategy used to find their prey: some rely mainly on visual cues, some rely on tactile cues, and others follow a more generalist method, simply sweeping the sediment surface with the bill. We hypothesized that these strategies influence the adoption of an ARS by waders. We analysed this hypothesis by comparing the fine-scale movement of a ‘tactile’ predator (black-tailed godwit, Limosa limosa ), with that of a ‘visual’ predator (redshank, Tringa totanus ) and a ‘sweeper’ (avocet, Recurvirostra avosetta ). We filmed 190 individuals of the three species and, using GIS facilities, obtained more than 12 000 spatial positions, along with detailed records of feeding activity. We analysed several parameters of fine-scale movement of waders, such as foraging and searching speeds, tortuosity, and the relationship between these parameters and foraging success. Only the tactile predator, the black-tailed godwit, followed an ARS, reducing searching speed and increasing spatial turning rate whenever the prey intake was higher. Furthermore, its foraging strategy involved short-term adjustments of movement that maximized the likelihood of finding subsequent prey, suggesting a prior knowledge or an ability to perceive rapidly the distribution pattern of its prey.

[1]  J. Goss‐Custard The Responses of Redshank (Tringa totanus (L.)) to Spatial Variations in the Density of their Prey , 1970 .

[2]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice , 2005 .

[3]  F. Moreira The winter feeding ecology of Avocets Recurvirostra avosetta on intertidal areas. I. Feeding strategies , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Searching behavior and use of sampling information by free-ranging bison (Bos bison) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  T. Piersma Energetic Bottlenecks and Other Design Constraints in Avian Annual Cycles1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[6]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Importance of drainage channels for waders foraging on tidal flats: relevasnce for the management of estuarine wetlands , 2005 .

[7]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. Goss‐Custard Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank, Tringa totanus, in the field , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  G. Thomas,et al.  The influences of encountering a food object on subsequent searching behaviour in Gasterosteus aculeatus L , 1974 .

[10]  B. Ens,et al.  Shorebirds: An illustrated Behavioural Ecology , 2004 .

[11]  S. Benhamou How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment* , 1992 .

[13]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  The energetic importance of night foraging for waders wintering in a temperate estuary , 2008 .

[14]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Search paths of swans foraging on spatially autocorrelated tubers , 2002 .

[15]  J. Gils,et al.  Foraging decisions in a digestively constrained long-distance migrant, the red knot (Calidris canutus) , 2004 .

[16]  E. Vogel,et al.  The foraging behavior of Semipalmated Sandpipers in the upper Bay of Fundy : Stereotyped or prey-sensitive? , 1997 .

[17]  P. Meire Using optimal foraging theory to determine the density of mussels Mytilus edulis that can be harvested by hammering Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. , 1996 .

[18]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[19]  D. Bryant,et al.  The Searching Speeds of Foraging Shorebirds: Redshank (Tringa totanus) and Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[20]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Does traditional shellfishing affect foraging by waders? The case of the Tagus estuary (Portugal) , 2008 .

[21]  J. Goss‐Custard The Energetics of Prey Selection by Redshank, Tringa totanus (L.), in Relation to Prey Density , 1977 .

[22]  F. Moreira The winter feeding ecology of Avocets Recurvirostra avosetta on intertidal areas. II. Diet and feeding mechanisms , 2008 .

[23]  R. Caldow,et al.  The development and use of individuals‐based models to predict the effects of habitat loss and disturbance on waders and waterfowl , 2006 .

[24]  T. Piersma,et al.  Roost availability may constrain shorebird distribution: Exploring the energetic costs of roosting and disturbance around a tropical bay , 2006 .

[25]  J. Gils,et al.  Holling's functional response model as a tool to link the food-finding mechanism of a probing shorebird with its spatial distribution , 1995 .

[26]  Robert P. Gendron,et al.  A Laboratory Simulation of Foraging Behavior: The Effect of Search Rate on the Probability of Detecting Prey , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[27]  B. Nolet,et al.  Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  P. Knoppien,et al.  Predators with two modes of searching: A mathematical model* , 1985 .

[29]  F. Moreira Diet, prey-size selection and intake rates of Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa feeding on mudflats , 1994 .

[30]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. II. Patch choice and length of working day , 2005 .

[31]  R. Mcneil,et al.  Comparative day and night feeding strategies of shorebird species in a tropical environment , 2008 .

[32]  Michael T. Burrows,et al.  Increased turning per unit distance as an area‐restricted search mechanism in a pause‐travel predator, juvenile plaice, foraging for buried bivalves , 2000 .

[33]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Variation in numbers and behaviour of waders during the tidal cycle: implications for the use of estuarine sediment flats , 2006 .