Mechanical performance of endodontic restorations with prefabricated posts: sensitivity analysis of parameters with a 3D finite element model

Many studies have investigated the effect of different parameters of the endodontically restored tooth on its final strength, using in vitro tests and model simulations. However, the differences in the experimental set-up or modelling conditions and the limited number of parameters studied in each case prevent us from obtaining clear conclusions about the relative importance of each parameter. In this study, a validated 3D biomechanical model of the restored tooth was used for an exhaustive sensitivity analysis. The individual influence of 20 different parameters on the mechanical performance of an endodontic restoration with prefabricated posts was studied. The results bring up the remarkable importance of the loading angle on the final restoration strength. Flexural loads are more critical than compressive or tensile loads. Young's modulus of the post and its length and diameter are the most influential parameters for strength, whereas other parameters such as ferrule geometry or core and crown characteristics are less significant.

[1]  Carmen González-Lluch,et al.  Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  I. Nergiz,et al.  Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Davide Salvatore Paolino,et al.  Effects of artificial aging on surface roughness of resin composites , 2011 .

[4]  Raffaella Aversa,et al.  3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  R Pietrabissa,et al.  Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. , 2006, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  F. Isidor,et al.  Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. , 1996, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  A A Caputo,et al.  Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  A. Apicella,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress and strain distributions in post-and-core treated maxillary central incisors. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[9]  R M Love,et al.  A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[10]  J. Geis-Gerstorfer,et al.  In vitro evaluation of a glass-ceramic restorative material. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  Giuseppe Vairo,et al.  Optimal mechanical design of anatomical post-systems for endodontic restoration. , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  D. R. Burns,et al.  In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. , 2001, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[13]  M. Cinelli,et al.  The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  P. Wilson,et al.  The ferrule effect: a literature review. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[15]  J. Gallo,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. , 2002, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[16]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  M. Kern,et al.  Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  J. Robbins Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  Richard M. Christensen A Comparative Evaluation of Three Isotropic, Two Property Failure Theories , 2006 .

[20]  R. Bedini,et al.  Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  A. Caputo,et al.  Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  B Rilo,et al.  Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  D. McComb,et al.  Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. , 2008, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[24]  D J Setchell,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  R. Stein,et al.  Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[27]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[28]  Koichiro Komatsu,et al.  Mechanical Strength and Viscoelastic Response of the Periodontal Ligament in Relation to Structure , 2009, Journal of dental biomechanics.

[29]  A. Grant,et al.  Factors influencing the retention of dowels. , 1977, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  J. Sancho-Bru,et al.  Experimental strength of restorations with fibre posts at different stages, with and without using a simulated ligament. , 2012, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[31]  D. R. Burns,et al.  Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[32]  P. Millstein,et al.  Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  A W Miller,et al.  Post and core systems: which one is best? , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[34]  M. R. Lund,et al.  Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[35]  Antonio Apicella,et al.  Carbon fiber post adhesion to resin luting cement in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth , 2000, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[36]  D. L. Gutteridge,et al.  An in vitro study into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[37]  J. Sancho-Bru,et al.  Influence of material and diameter of pre-fabricated posts on maxillary central incisors restored with crown. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[38]  Luigi Nicolais,et al.  Fiber post adhesion to resin luting cements in the restoration of endodontically-treated teeth. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[39]  K Genovese,et al.  Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  J. Sancho-Bru,et al.  Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[41]  Chih-Han Chang,et al.  Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[42]  M. Ding,et al.  Mechanical strength of ceramic scaffolds reinforced with biopolymers is comparable to that of human bone , 2011, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[43]  A. Al-Wahadni,et al.  An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[44]  John M. Powers,et al.  Craig's Restorative Dental Materials , 2012 .

[45]  M. Toledano,et al.  Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. , 2008, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[46]  P. Brockhurst,et al.  The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. , 1993, Australian dental journal.

[47]  D. Purton,et al.  Factors influencing the removal of posts. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[48]  Melin Sahin,et al.  Stress Distribution of Post–Core Applications in Maxillary Central Incisors , 2004, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[49]  J. Sancho-Bru,et al.  Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[50]  Charles M. Friedman,et al.  Composition and Mechanical Properties of Gutta-Percha Endodontic Points , 1975, Journal of dental research.

[51]  W. Eakle,et al.  Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[52]  D T Davy,et al.  Determination of Stress Patterns in Root-filled Teeth Incorporating Various Dowel Designs , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[53]  Begüm Akkayan,et al.  Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[54]  L. Stockton Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[55]  B. Bergeron,et al.  Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[56]  I. Heling,et al.  Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. , 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[57]  A. Caputo,et al.  The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[58]  R. Aversa,et al.  Non-linear viscoelastic finite element analysis of the effect of the length of glass fiber posts on the biomechanical behaviour of directly restored incisors and surrounding alveolar bone. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[59]  Raffaella Aversa,et al.  Nonlinear visco-elastic finite element analysis of different porcelain veneers configuration. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[60]  Erik Asmussen,et al.  Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[61]  G Zappini,et al.  Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[62]  M. Hsu,et al.  Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: a 3D finite element analysis. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[63]  Chii-Chih Hsu,et al.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. , 2003, Quintessence international.

[64]  D. Felton,et al.  Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[65]  J. Nissan,et al.  The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[66]  A A Caputo,et al.  Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. , 1972, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[67]  J. Chai,et al.  Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[68]  Harshwardhan Arya,et al.  Effect of variation of root post in different layers of tooth: linear vs nonlinear finite element stress analysis. , 2007, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[69]  A. Plasschaert,et al.  Failure Stress Criteria for Composite Resin , 1987, Journal of dental research.