Co-Witnesses, Confederates, and Conformity: Effects of Discussion and Delay on Eyewitness Memory

This study investigated the effects of co-witness discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Participants viewed crime videos and then after a delay (20 min or 2 weeks) their memories for the videos were tested using a recognition questionnaire. They were then randomly assigned to one of three conditions: discussion in groups with a confederate providing misinformation about the videos, discussion in groups with no confederate, or no discussion. Finally, all participants were given another copy of the recognition questionnaire to complete individually. Participants in the confederate discussion condition reported information supplied by the confederate, regardless of the information accuracy. The post-event misinformation had a particularly strong effect on memory accuracy when it was presented after a longer delay. There was no difference in memory accuracy between the groups without confederates and the no-discussion control condition, suggesting that discussion is neither harmful nor beneficial to memory accuracy when no misinformation is supplied.

[1]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  H. Paterson,et al.  Comparing methods of encountering post‐event information: the power of co‐witness suggestion , 2006 .

[3]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[4]  Clive R. Hollin,et al.  Eyewitness Testimony: The Effects of Discussion on Recall Accuracy and Agreement , 1983 .

[5]  H. Paterson,et al.  Co-witness Discussion: A Survey of Police Officers' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviour , 2005 .

[6]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Social recognition memory: the effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  Sena Garven,et al.  Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports , 1997, Law and human behavior.

[8]  E. Loftus,et al.  Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[9]  H L Roediger,et al.  Social contagion of memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  M J Watkins,et al.  Response conformity in recognition testing , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  Say it to my face: examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation , 2004 .

[12]  Celia B. Harris,et al.  Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? , 2008, Memory.

[13]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  The Effects of Dyadic Discussion on Earwitness Recall , 1992 .

[14]  D. Wright,et al.  Memory conformity: exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[15]  G. Underwood,et al.  Collusion after a collision: Witnesses' reports of a road accident with and without discussion , 1993 .

[16]  The malleability of memory , 2011 .

[17]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[18]  E. Loftus.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[19]  H. Paterson,et al.  Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion , 2006 .

[20]  E F Loftus,et al.  The malleability of human memory. , 1979, American scientist.

[21]  The Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory1 , 1998 .