Diagnostic assessment by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance in differentiation of breast lesions under different imaging protocols

BackgroundThe apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a highly diagnostic factor in discriminating malignant and benign breast masses in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). The combination of ADC and other pictorial characteristics has improved lesion type identification accuracy. The objective of this study was to reassess the findings on an independent patient group by changing the magnetic field from 1.5-Tesla to 3.0-Tesla.MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of a training group of 234 female patients, including 85 benign and 149 malignant lesions, imaged using 1.5-Tesla MRI, and a test group of 95 female patients, including 19 benign and 85 malignant lesions, imaged using 3.0-Tesla MRI. The lesion of interest was segmented from the raw image and four sets of measurements describing the morphology, kinetics, DW-MRI, and texture of the pictorial properties of each lesion were obtained. Each lesion was characterized by 28 features in total. Three classical machine-learning algorithms were used to build prediction models on the training group, which evaluated the prognostic performance of the multi-sided features in three scenarios. To reduce information redundancy, five highly diagnostic factors were selected to obtain a compact yet informative characterization of the lesion status.ResultsThree classification models were built on the training of 1.5-Tesla patients and were tested on the independent 3.0-Tesla test group. The following results were found. i) Characterization of breast masses in a multi-sided way dramatically increased prediction performance. The usage of all features gave a higher performance in both sensitivity and specificity than any individual feature groups or their combinations. ii) ADC was a highly effective factor in improving the sensitivity in discriminating malignant from benign masses. iii) Five features, namely ADC, Sum Average, Entropy, Elongation, and Sum Variance, were selected to achieve the highest performance in diagnosis of the 3.0-Tesla patient group.ConclusionsThe combination of ADC and other multi-sided characteristics can increase the capability of discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions, even under different imaging protocols. The selected compact feature subsets achieved a high diagnostic performance and thus are promising in clinical applications for discriminating lesion type and for personalized treatment planning.

[1]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Prognostic value of pre-treatment DCE-MRI parameters in predicting disease free and overall survival for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[3]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Zhang Yun,et al.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[5]  M. Bellomi,et al.  Breast MR with special focus on DW-MRI and DCE-MRI , 2011, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[6]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Feature Weighting by RELIEF Based on Local Hyperplane Approximation , 2012, PAKDD.

[7]  Masanori Ozaki,et al.  ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[8]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. , 2007, Radiology.

[9]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  R. Chang,et al.  Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  T. Mochizuki,et al.  Comparison of breast cancer detection by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and mammography , 2007, Radiation Medicine.

[12]  Saadallah Ramadan,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  Mehmet Fatih Akay,et al.  Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Dayou Liu,et al.  A support vector machine classifier with rough set-based feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  F. Gianfelici,et al.  Nearest-Neighbor Methods in Learning and Vision (Shakhnarovich, G. et al., Eds.; 2006) [Book review] , 2008 .

[17]  Kuo-Lung Wu,et al.  Analysis of parameter selections for fuzzy c-means , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Lina Arbash Meinel,et al.  Breast MRI lesion classification: Improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer‐aided diagnosis (CAD) system , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Developing a classifier model for lung tumors in CT-scan images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Dar-Ren Chen,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors with ultrasonic texture analysis using support vector machines , 2006, Neural Computing & Applications.

[21]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  N M Hylton,et al.  Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[23]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Optimal Combination of Feature Weight Learning and Classification Based on Local Approximation , 2012, ICDKE.

[24]  A. Cilotti,et al.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion , 2007, European Radiology.

[25]  A. D. De Schepper,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Aixia Guo,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[27]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[28]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Feature weight estimation for gene selection: a local hyperlinear learning approach , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Nearest-Neighbor Methods in Learning and Vision: Theory and Practice (Neural Information Processing) , 2006 .

[30]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[31]  M. Becich,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis of ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 in prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2011, BMC urology.

[32]  Usha Sinha,et al.  In vivo diffusion‐weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[34]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[37]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[38]  Leila Mohammadi,et al.  BMC Cancer , 2001 .

[39]  P Abdolmaleki,et al.  Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network. , 2001, Cancer letters.

[40]  Thierry Metens,et al.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: A clinical prospective study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  Gloria Menegaz,et al.  DCE-MRI and DWI Integration for Breast Lesions Assessment and Heterogeneity Quantification , 2012, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[42]  Evelyn Wenkel,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[43]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Nearest-Neighbor Methods in Learning and Vision , 2008, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[44]  Ning-Yu An,et al.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  Kaori Togashi,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[46]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  DCEMRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? , 2008, Medical physics.

[47]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[48]  F. Cendes,et al.  Texture analysis of medical images. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[49]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Enhanced mass on contrast‐enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted MR images , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[50]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI of breast tumors , 2000, European Radiology.

[51]  Takeo Ishigaki,et al.  The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery , 2002, Breast cancer.

[52]  Simone Schrading,et al.  MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study , 2007, The Lancet.