Special issue of the Journal of Cleaner Production, ‘From Material Flow Analysis to Material Flow Management’: strategic sustainability management on a principle level

Abstract The process of sustainable development and its goal, sustainability, are difficult to define. Many conflicting interests and preferences are involved. Recently, scientists have attempted a principle-orientated definition of sustainability. Unlike specific, detailed and quantitative thresholds, principles can be general, qualitative, flexible and sufficient to make progress when combined with more detailed and case-specific strategies, approaches, tools and indicators. The Natural Step (TNS) principles have been defined in a consensus process between 10 pioneering sustainability scientists and presented as sustainability principles . We develop criteria for evaluating the TNS principles. The criteria are applied to eco-efficiency (EE) principles that have become, perhaps, the most popular principles in the discourse on sustainability policies and management. EE has also been offered as the general and overall vision and goal for policy and management; increased efficiency in materials and energy use is perceived as desirable. We find that the eco-efficiency principles are not suitable as sustainability principles. The EE principles can be used as practical actions and concrete measures under the overall TNS sustainability principles.

[1]  Karl-Henrik Robèrt,et al.  Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? , 2000 .

[2]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Eco‐efficiency: Philosophy, Theory, and Tools , 2005 .

[3]  J. Hukkinen.  Corporatism as an impediment to ecological sustenance: the case of Finnish waste management , 1995 .

[4]  Janne Hukkinen,et al.  From groundless universalism to grounded generalism: improving ecological economic indicators of human-environmental interaction , 2003 .

[5]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in , 2006 .

[6]  Christian Rammel,et al.  Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising , 2003 .

[7]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  Strategic sustainable development — selection, design and synergies of applied tools , 2002 .

[8]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy , 2005 .

[9]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Transition towards improved regional wood flows by integrating material flux analysis and agent analysis : the case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Switzerland , 2004 .

[10]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[11]  Igor Matutinović,et al.  Organizational patterns of economies: an ecological perspective , 2002 .

[12]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Importing Timber, Exporting Ecological Impact , 2005, Science.

[13]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  The dominant economics paradigm and corporate social responsibility , 2002 .

[14]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bse.487 Really Changing the Course: the Limitations of Environmental Management Systems for Innovation , 2022 .

[15]  A. Mayer,et al.  The multidisciplinary influence of common sustainability indices , 2004 .

[16]  Robert M. Solow.  Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow-Stiglitz , 1997 .

[17]  David Cook,et al.  Strategic Leadership towards Sustainability , 2004 .

[18]  Igor Matutinović.  The aspects and the role of diversity in socioeconomic systems: an evolutionary perspective , 2001 .

[19]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Integrating Environment and Economy Through Ecological Modernisation , 2000, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[20]  J. Evans,et al.  Editorial to: Cutting across interests: cleaner production, the unified force of sustainable development , 2004 .

[21]  R. Costanza,et al.  Creating a sustainable and desirable New Orleans , 2006 .

[22]  Michael H. Huesemann,et al.  Can pollution problems be effectively solved by environmental science and technology? An analysis of critical limitations ☆ , 2001 .

[23]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology , 2000 .

[24]  J. Hukkinen.  Expert thinking and environmental institutions , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[25]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions , 2005 .

[26]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[27]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Toward a Methods Framework for Eco‐efficiency Analysis? , 2005 .

[28]  R. Costanza,et al.  The evolution of preferences Why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it , 1998 .

[29]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution , 2001 .

[30]  Y. Haila.  Biodiversity and the divide between culture and nature , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[31]  T. Hahn,et al.  Sustainable Value Added - Measuring Corporate Contributions to Sustainability Beyond Eco-Efficiency , 2004 .

[32]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design , 1997 .

[33]  H. Daly.  Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[34]  Frank Boons,et al.  Industrial Ecology as a Cultural Phenomenon: On Objectivity as a Normative Position , 2000 .

[35]  R. Howarth,et al.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world , 2006 .

[36]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Georgescu-Roegen/Daly versus Solow/Stiglitz Revisited , 1998 .

[37]  Richard Welford,et al.  Editorial: Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda , 1998 .

[38]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  An evaluative framework for conceptual and analytical approaches used in environmental management , 1999 .

[39]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Reconciling the electricity industry with sustainable development: Backcasting - A strategic alternative , 2001 .

[40]  Joseph E. Stiglitz.  Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz , 1997 .

[41]  Janne Hukkinen,et al.  Sustainability indicators for anticipating the fickleness of human–environmental interaction , 2003 .