An Evaluation of Performance Standards and Non-radioactive Endpoints for the Local Lymph Node Assay

This is the report of the 65th of a series of workshops organised by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). The main objective of ECVAM, as defined in 1993 by its Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC), is to promote the scientific and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods which have scientific relevance and which reduce, refine or replace the use of laboratory animals. One of the first priorities set by ECVAM was the implementation of procedures that would enable it to become well-informed about the state-of-the-art of non-animal test development and validation, and of opportunities for the possible incorporation of alternative methods into regulatory procedures. It was decided that this would be best achieved through a programme of ECVAM workshops, each addressing a specific topic, and at which selected groups of independent international experts would review the current status of various types of in vitro tests and their potential uses, and make recommendations about the best way forward. A Workshop on An Evaluation of Performance Standards and Non-radioactive Endpoints for the Local Lymph Node Assay was held at ECVAM on 25–27 September 2007, under the chairmanship of David Basketter. The workshop was attended by experts from academia, industry, national organisations, and national and international validation authorities. At present, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) involves the use of radiolabelled thymidine as part of the standard protocol. The aim of the workshop was to review the status of methods which employ non-radioactive endpoints for the LLNA and to consider Performance Standards for their eventual assessment. At the end of the report are listed recommendations that should be considered for progressing toward the validation of relevant and reliable methods.

[1]  Shuzo Matsumoto,et al.  Evaluation of the proliferative response of lymphocytes by measurement of intracellular ATP , 1984 .

[2]  D A Basketter,et al.  Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. , 1994, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[3]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  A Modular Approach to the ECVAM Principles on Test Validity , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[4]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  The Local Lymph Node Assay: Current Position in the Regulatory Classification of Skin Sensitizing Chemicals , 2007, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[5]  B H Margolin,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Miguel Cámara,et al.  Development of a bioluminescent ATP assay to quantify mammalian and bacterial cell number from a mixed population. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[7]  Michio Ito,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of a modified local lymph node assay using ATP content as a non-radio isotopic endpoint. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[8]  G F Gerberick,et al.  Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in lymph nodes draining the ear following exposure to contact allergens and irritants. , 1996, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  H. van Loveren,et al.  An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: first round. , 2005, Toxicology.

[10]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[11]  I. Kimber,et al.  Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon‐γ and interleukin 12 , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[12]  Kenji Idehara,et al.  Development of a Modified Local Lymph Node Assay using ATP Measurement as an Endpoint , 2005 .

[13]  G F Gerberick,et al.  Selective modulation of T cell memory markers CD62L and CD44 on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen and irritant treatment. , 1997, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  M Hatao,et al.  Development of a non-radioactive endpoint in a modified local lymph node assay. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. , 1994, Toxicology.

[17]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[18]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  I Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. , 2000, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[20]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Production by Lymph Node Cells: An Alternative Endpoint for the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay , 1993 .

[21]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[22]  I Kimber,et al.  Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[23]  L Ullmann,et al.  An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: 2nd round. , 2005, Toxicology.

[24]  I Kimber,et al.  Development of non-radio isotopic endpoint of murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. , 2001, Toxicology letters.

[25]  A. Kligman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig : identifications of contact allergens , 1970 .

[26]  SKIN SENSITIZATION IN CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT , 2008 .

[27]  B. Homey,et al.  An intra-laboratory validation of the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions (IMDS): discrimination between (photo)allergic and (photo)irritant skin reactions in mice , 2000, Archives of Toxicology.

[28]  David A. Basketter,et al.  Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[29]  G F Gerberick,et al.  An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[31]  W Slob,et al.  A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins. , 2000, Toxicology.

[32]  Michael Balls Defined Structural and Performance Criteria would Facilitate the Validation and Acceptance of Alternative Test Procedures , 1997 .

[33]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[34]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[35]  A. Boman,et al.  Guinea pig maximization test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[36]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[37]  I Kimber,et al.  Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[38]  Masahiro Takeyoshi,et al.  Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non‐radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay , 2005, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[39]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Assessment of statistic analysis in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay (non-RI-LLNA) with alpha-hexylcinnamic aldehyde as an example. , 2003, Toxicology.

[40]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[41]  Frank Gerberick,et al.  The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[42]  Gregory S. Ladies,et al.  Comparison of 125-Iododeoxyuridine (125IUdR) and [3H]Thymidine ([3H]TdR) for Assessing Cell Proliferation in the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay , 1995 .

[43]  Ian Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: past, present and future , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[44]  I Kimber,et al.  Preliminary assessment of the skin sensitizing activity of selected rodent carcinogens using the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Toxicology.

[45]  D A Basketter,et al.  Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.