Predicting the trajectory of manufacturing quality with work team implementation

Abstract Despite the widespread introduction of work teams in plants to improve manufacturing quality, the academic and practitioner literature offers little guidance to predict the trajectory of quality improvement. This paper documents the development of a framework to predict the magnitude and timing of quality improvement with work team implementation on production lines. From the standpoint of practice, the framework has the potential to inform the management of the work team implementation process so that the quality impact of teams can be increased and realized faster.

[1]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Commitment, Quits, and Work Organization in Japanese and U.S. Plants , 1996 .

[2]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Beating Murphy's Law , 1991 .

[3]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[4]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996 .

[5]  John F. Muth,et al.  Search Theory and the Manufacturing Progress Function , 1986 .

[6]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[7]  D. Levine.  Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment , 1990 .

[8]  D. Vollrath,et al.  Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes , 1988 .

[9]  Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  The Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations , 1991 .

[10]  A. Roth,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Service Quality and Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry , 1995 .

[11]  E. Lawler.  Total Quality Management and employee involvement: Are they compatible? , 1994 .

[12]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Fact and Fiction in Analyzing Research on Participative Decision Making: A Critique of Cotton, Vollrath, Froggatt, Lengnick-Hall, and Jennings , 1990 .

[13]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Groups and Productivity; Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams , 1988 .

[14]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[15]  Randall G. Stott,et al.  Quality circles: Panacea or pandora's box.? , 1985 .

[16]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[17]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Contrasts in enacting TQM: Mechanistic vs. organic ideology and implementation , 1997 .

[18]  Louis E. Yelle.  THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[19]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Consequences of Quality Circles in an Industrial Setting: A Longitudinal Assessment , 1988 .

[20]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[21]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Participation, Satisfaction, and Productivity: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1986 .

[22]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Values on Employee Resistance to Teams: Toward A Model of Globalized Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[23]  Maryellen R. Kelley,et al.  Productivity and Information Technology: The Elusive Connection , 1994 .

[24]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[25]  R. Drago,et al.  Quality Circle Survival: An Exploratory Analysis , 1988 .

[26]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[27]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Science, Specific Knowledge and Total Quality Management , 1994 .

[28]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[29]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  REFRAMING THE ORGANIZATION: WHY IMPLEMENTING TOTAL QUALITY IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE , 1994 .

[30]  N. Baloff,et al.  The Learning Curve--Some Controversial Issues , 1966 .

[31]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[32]  W. Zangwill,et al.  Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve , 1998 .

[33]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[34]  Maury Gittleman,et al.  “Flexible” Workplace Practices: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey , 1998 .

[35]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Beyond testimonials: Learning from a quality circles programme , 1985 .

[36]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[38]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[39]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  A Punctuated-Equilibrium Model of Technology Diffusion , 1999 .

[40]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry , 1987 .

[41]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[42]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[43]  Gregory S. Parnell,et al.  Framing Strategic Decisions , 1998 .

[44]  Werner Z. Hirsch,et al.  Firm Progress Ratios , 1956 .

[45]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Explaining Observed Productivity Differentials Between Plants: Implications for Operations Research , 1985 .

[46]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. , 1987 .

[47]  Ron McLachlin,et al.  Management initiatives and just-in-time manufacturing , 1997 .

[48]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Quality circles: After the honeymoon , 1987 .

[49]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .