Personality Based Gamification: How Different Personalities perceive Gamification

Personality is known to moderate task performance, learning styles, and gaming preferences. With the inclusion of game elements into non-game contexts such as education and workplaces, it is essential to develop models that will help explain and predict the influence of personality in environments that are, unlike the existing research, both ludic and utilitarian at the same time. In this study which is the first in a series of studies, we apply game elements to an undergraduate information systems course and examine the students perception of playfulness (n=102). Students completed a five factor personality test and answered questions about their preference for specific game elements and their overall playfulness from the gamification applied. T-tests and Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis were performed comparing low and high measures of each personality trait revealing a higher preference level for badges by introverts and higher levels of preference from progression by agreeable personalities. Several significant differences in the overall playfulness were found in the relations of the path model and are presented. The significance of these results comes from the understanding that playfulness from game elements is not always granted and depends among other factors on personality.

[1]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[2]  Kai Huotari,et al.  "Gamification" from the perspective of service marketing , 2011 .

[3]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[4]  Paulo B. Góes,et al.  Editor's comments: information systems research and behavioral economics , 2013 .

[5]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[6]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work , 2014 .

[7]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[8]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[10]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[11]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Ching-I Teng,et al.  Personality Differences between Online Game Players and Nonplayers in a Student Sample , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[14]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality, learning style and work performance , 1999 .

[15]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Christine T. Kydd,et al.  Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation , 1997, DATB.

[17]  Harri Sarsa.  Does Gamification Work? A Literature Review , 2013 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area , 1992 .

[20]  Robert Zubek,et al.  MDA : A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research , 2004 .

[21]  James B. Hittner,et al.  Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[23]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style , 2007, MIS Q..

[26]  Lisa J. Orchard,et al.  Current Perspectives on Personality and Internet Use , 2010 .

[27]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  "On the Internet No One Knows I'm an Introvert": Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Brenda Brathwaite,et al.  Challenges for Game Designers , 2008 .

[30]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[32]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[33]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[34]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[35]  Nitya Narasimhan.  The Gamification of Television: is there life beyond badges? , 2011 .

[36]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  Christopher Cunningham,et al.  Gamification by Design - Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps , 2011 .

[38]  E. Churchill,et al.  Badges in Social Media: A Social Psychological Perspective , 2011 .

[39]  K. Werbach,et al.  For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business , 2012 .

[40]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[41]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  Validating Formative Partial Least Squares (PLS) Models: Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration , 2009, ICIS.

[43]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and learning style: A study of three instruments , 1992 .

[44]  James K. Harter,et al.  Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[46]  Terence A. Oliva,et al.  Play as a Consumption Experience: The Roles of Emotions, Performance, and Personality in the Enjoyment of Games , 1984 .

[47]  Oded Nov,et al.  Exploring personality-targeted UI design in online social participation systems , 2013, CHI.

[48]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[49]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[50]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[51]  Justin R. Read,et al.  Students’ learning styles and academic performance in first year chemistry , 2012 .