Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy

“Collective intelligence” and “wisdom of crowds” refer to situations in which groups achieve more accurate perception and better decisions than solitary agents. Whether groups outperform individuals should depend on the kind of task and its difficulty, but the nature of this relationship remains unknown. Here we show that colonies of Temnothorax ants outperform individuals for a difficult perception task but that individuals do better than groups when the task is easy. Subjects were required to choose the better of two nest sites as the quality difference was varied. For small differences, colonies were more likely than isolated ants to choose the better site, but this relationship was reversed for large differences. We explain these results using a mathematical model, which shows that positive feedback between group members effectively integrates information and sharpens the discrimination of fine differences. When the task is easier the same positive feedback can lock the colony into a suboptimal choice. These results suggest the conditions under which crowds do or do not become wise.

[1]  F. Galton.  Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.

[2]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elements of psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .

[4]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[5]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[6]  H. G. Wallraff.  Social interrelations involved in migratory orientation of birds: Possible contribution of field studies , 1978 .

[7]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Intelligence: Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism , 2000, Nature.

[8]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[10]  P. Visscher,et al.  Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  L. Chittka,et al.  Biological significance of distinguishing between similar colours in spectrally variable illumination: bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) as a case study , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Information flow and regulation of foraging activity in bumble bees (Bombus spp.) , 2004 .

[17]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  Noise, cost and speed-accuracy trade-offs: decision-making in a decentralized system , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  T. Seeley,et al.  Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  S. Pratt.  Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[23]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  S. Pratt.  Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[25]  L. Chittka,et al.  Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Animal Behaviour and Floral Evolution , 2005 .

[26]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  E. Reggiani.  Inglese: C. Mackay, The Earl of Oxford's masterpiece (from Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, 1841) , 2005 .

[28]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants "behave" like molecules? , 2006 .

[30]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Colony size affects collective decision-making in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[31]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[32]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[33]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Stephen C. Pratt,et al.  Efficiency and regulation of recruitment during colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  J. Spaethe,et al.  Comparative psychophysics of bumblebee and honeybee colour discrimination and object detection , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  I. Couzin.  Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[41]  D. Sumpter.  Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[42]  Stefan Krause,et al.  Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  S. Pratt,et al.  Emergence of group rationality from irrational individuals , 2011 .

[44]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Key Factors for the Emergence of Collective Decision in Invertebrates , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[46]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  S. Pratt,et al.  Groups have a larger cognitive capacity than individuals , 2012, Current Biology.

[48]  C. Frith,et al.  What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Six Predictions about the Decision Making of Animal and Human Groups , 2012 .