Dissociable Effects of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention during Episodic Encoding

It is well established that the formation of memories for life's experiences—episodic memory—is influenced by how we attend to those experiences, yet the neural mechanisms by which attention shapes episodic encoding are still unclear. We investigated how top-down and bottom-up attention contribute to memory encoding of visual objects in humans by manipulating both types of attention during fMRI of episodic memory formation. We show that dorsal parietal cortex—specifically, intraparietal sulcus (IPS)—was engaged during top-down attention and was also recruited during the successful formation of episodic memories. By contrast, bottom-up attention engaged ventral parietal cortex—specifically, temporoparietal junction (TPJ)—and was also more active during encoding failure. Functional connectivity analyses revealed further dissociations in how top-down and bottom-up attention influenced encoding: while both IPS and TPJ influenced activity in perceptual cortices thought to represent the information being encoded (fusiform/lateral occipital cortex), they each exerted opposite effects on memory encoding. Specifically, during a preparatory period preceding stimulus presentation, a stronger drive from IPS was associated with a higher likelihood that the subsequently attended stimulus would be encoded. By contrast, during stimulus processing, stronger connectivity with TPJ was associated with a lower likelihood the stimulus would be successfully encoded. These findings suggest that during encoding of visual objects into episodic memory, top-down and bottom-up attention can have opposite influences on perceptual areas that subserve visual object representation, suggesting that one manner in which attention modulates memory is by altering the perceptual processing of to-be-encoded stimuli.

[1]  R. Desimone,et al.  Long-range neural coupling through synchronization with attention. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[2]  Michael J. Kahana,et al.  Direct brain recordings fuel advances in cognitive electrophysiology , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  G. Boynton Attention and visual perception , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[7]  H. V. Restorff Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld , 1933 .

[8]  S. Treue Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Contributions of occipital, parietal and parahippocampal cortex to encoding of object-location associations , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Elizabeth A. Kensinger,et al.  What Neural Correlates Underlie Successful Encoding and Retrieval? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Using a Divided Attention Paradigm , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Heekyeong Park,et al.  The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. Desmond,et al.  Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. , 1998, Science.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  C. Stern,et al.  Prefrontal–Temporal Circuitry for Episodic Encoding and Subsequent Memory , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural Correlates of Attentional Capture in Visual Search , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  L. Davachi,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Forgetting of things past , 2001, Current Biology.

[18]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Effects of Divided Attention on fMRI Correlates of Memory Encoding , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  Lila Davachi,et al.  When Keeping in Mind Supports Later Bringing to Mind: Neural Markers of Phonological Rehearsal Predict Subsequent Remembering , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Episodic Encoding Is More than the Sum of Its Parts: An fMRI Investigation of Multifeatural Contextual Encoding , 2006, Neuron.

[23]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[24]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[27]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  14 Attention and the Control of Movements , 1980 .

[28]  K. Paller,et al.  Observing the transformation of experience into memory , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Downar,et al.  The Effect of Task Relevance on the Cortical Response to Changes in Visual and Auditory Stimuli: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[31]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Modularity and neuropsychology: Modules and central processes in attention and memory. , 1990 .

[32]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Dissociable Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Predictable and Unpredictable Events , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Item-and Task-Level Processes in Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex : Positive and Negative Correlates of Encoding , 2003 .

[34]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[35]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[36]  R. Goebel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Clayton E Curtis,et al.  Cortical activity time locked to the shift and maintenance of spatial attention. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[40]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[41]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  J. Gläscher,et al.  Dissociable contributions within the medial temporal lobe to encoding of object-location associations. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[43]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  A Roadmap to Brain Mapping: Toward a Functional Map of Human Parietal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[45]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Selecting for Memory? The Influence of Selective Attention on the Mnemonic Binding of Contextual Information , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Rugg,et al.  Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  C. Elger,et al.  Human memory formation is accompanied by rhinal–hippocampal coupling and decoupling , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Daniel Herron,et al.  A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. , 2004, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Pierre Maquet,et al.  Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  E Donchin,et al.  Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[53]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[54]  M. Rugg,et al.  Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Chun,et al.  Linking Implicit and Explicit Memory: Common Encoding Factors and Shared Representations , 2006, Neuron.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Detecting Perceptual, Semantic, and Emotional Deviance , 2000, NeuroImage.

[58]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[59]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Asymmetry of Anticipatory Activity in Visual Cortex Predicts the Locus of Attention and Perception , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  A Parcellation Scheme for Human Left Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[61]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Fractionation of the Component Processes Underlying Successful Episodic Encoding: A Combined fMRI and Divided-attention Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  C. Grady,et al.  Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: Meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[66]  S. M. Daselaar,et al.  When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[67]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  C. Ranganath,et al.  Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Promotes Long-Term Memory Formation through Its Role in Working Memory Organization , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention : How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations , 2007 .

[70]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[71]  Daniel L Schacter,et al.  Evidence for a specific role of the anterior hippocampal region in successful associative encoding , 2007, Hippocampus.

[72]  D. Schacter,et al.  When encoding yields remembering: insights from event-related neuroimaging. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[73]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[74]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[75]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.

[76]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[77]  S. Kastner,et al.  Topographic maps in human frontal and parietal cortex , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[79]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[80]  L. Davachi Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[81]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural Evidence That Vivid Imagining Can Lead to False Remembering , 2004, Psychological science.

[82]  J. Gore,et al.  A Stimulus-Driven Approach to Object Identity and Location Processing in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[83]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[84]  G. R. Fink,et al.  The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability , 2006, Neuroscience.

[85]  R. Henson,et al.  The neural basis of episodic memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[86]  R. Buckner,et al.  Neural correlates of verbal memory encoding during semantic and structural processing tasks , 2001, Neuroreport.

[87]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[88]  L. Otten,et al.  Fragments of a larger whole: retrieval cues constrain observed neural correlates of memory encoding. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[89]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Interaction of Stimulus-Driven Reorienting and Expectation in Ventral and Dorsal Frontoparietal and Basal Ganglia-Cortical Networks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[91]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Top-down control of visual attention , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[92]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[93]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[94]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[95]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Attention to Memory and the Environment: Functional Specialization and Dynamic Competition in Human Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[96]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Towards a functional organization of the medial temporal lobe memory system: Role of the parahippocampal and medial entorhinal cortical areas , 2008, Hippocampus.

[97]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[98]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[99]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[100]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[101]  M. Rugg,et al.  Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: A combined fmri and divided-attention study , 2008 .

[102]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[103]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[104]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[105]  M. Rugg,et al.  When more means less neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding , 2001, Current Biology.

[106]  Tirin Moore,et al.  Influence and Limitations of Popout in the Selection of Salient Visual Stimuli by Area V4 Neurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[107]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.